While the Supreme Court Percolates, More States Advance Hardware Bans

March 11, 2026
8:00 am

▶

Listen to Article

While the Supreme Court mulls over critical Second Amendment cases like Rahimi and potentially others that could redefine sensitive places and arms bans, anti-gun activists aren't hitting pause—they're flooring the accelerator on state-level hardware restrictions. Just look at the latest flurry: Colorado's legislature is pushing HB24-1353 to ban assault weapons with vague definitions that could ensnare everything from AR-15s to certain shotguns, while Washington's Senate Bill 5448 eyes similar prohibitions on high-capacity magazines and semi-autos. Michigan and Minnesota aren't far behind, with bills floating that mirror California's draconian playbook. These aren't isolated spasms; they're a coordinated blitz by gun-control lobbies like Everytown and Giffords, exploiting the SCOTUS delay to stack the deck before any high-court smackdown. This isn't mere legislating—it's a classic goalpost shuffle, where yesterday's common-sense reforms become tomorrow's outright confiscation blueprints. Remember post-Bruen (2022), when states promised restraint but instead birthed a patchwork of good-for-nothing permit schemes and red-flag expansions? Now, with SCOTUS percolating on whether domestic violence restraining orders justify disarming non-violent citizens, blue states are preemptively entrenching hardware bans to make them SCOTUS-proof. The implications for the 2A community are stark: if these pass, expect a surge in non-compliance movements like we've seen in New York with mag bans, plus a flood of lawsuits testing Bruen's text, history, and tradition standard. It's a reminder that federal wins are fragile without state-level vigilance—gun owners must rally at capitols, fund FPC and GOA challenges, and vote like our rights depend on it, because they do. The silver lining? These overreaches often backfire, galvanizing turnout and exposing the incrementalism for what it is: a slow boil toward total disarmament. As the Court deliberates, the 2A grassroots is our firewall—organize, litigate, and resist, because the anti-gunners' never done ethos demands nothing less. Stay locked and loaded, patriots.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

This isn’t mere legislating—it’s a classic goalpost shuffle, where yesterday’s common-sense reforms become tomorrow’s outright confiscation blueprints. Remember post-Bruen (2022), when states promised restraint but instead birthed a patchwork of good-for-nothing permit schemes and red-flag expansions? Now, with SCOTUS percolating on whether domestic violence restraining orders justify disarming non-violent citizens, blue states are preemptively entrenching hardware bans to make them SCOTUS-proof. The implications for the 2A community are stark: if these pass, expect a surge in non-compliance movements like we’ve seen in New York with mag bans, plus a flood of lawsuits testing Bruen’s text, history, and tradition standard. It’s a reminder that federal wins are fragile without state-level vigilance—gun owners must rally at capitols, fund FPC and GOA challenges, and vote like our rights depend on it, because they do.

The silver lining? These overreaches often backfire, galvanizing turnout and exposing the incrementalism for what it is: a slow boil toward total disarmament. As the Court deliberates, the 2A grassroots is our firewall—organize, litigate, and resist, because the anti-gunners’ never done ethos demands nothing less. Stay locked and loaded, patriots.

Share this story