Hate ads?! Want to be able to search and filter? Day and Night mode? Subscribe for just $5 a month!

New Jersey State Police Sued Over Denied Records Requests on Retired Cop Carry Permits

Listen to Article

Journalist John Petrolino, a relentless voice for Second Amendment transparency, has filed a lawsuit against the New Jersey State Police, accusing them of stonewalling his public records requests for data on retired law enforcement carry permits. Petrolino’s OPRA (Open Public Records Act) demands sought basic info like approval rates, denial stats, and applicant numbers for these sensitive permits—privileges that let retired cops carry concealed statewide without the gauntlet of hoops civilians must jump through. The NJSP rejected the requests outright, citing exemptions for personnel records and ongoing investigations, but Petrolino argues this reeks of selective secrecy: the same agency freely dishes out civilian permit stats to media and activists, exposing everyday gun owners to scrutiny while shielding their own from the light.

This isn’t just a paperwork spat—it’s a masterclass in the double standards baked into blue-state gun laws. New Jersey’s permit process for civilians is a notorious meat grinder, with rejection rates hovering around 70-80% in some counties, arbitrary good cause requirements, and endless delays that can stretch years. Retired LEOs? They get a golden ticket under LEOSA (Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act), but Petrolino’s suit spotlights how states like NJ layer on extra opacity, hiding whether these permits are rubber-stamped or abused. Imagine the hypocrisy: while civilians like doctors, teachers, and small business owners beg for scraps of self-defense rights, ex-cops enjoy presumptive carry with zero public accountability. Petrolino’s legal salvo, filed in Superior Court, could crack open this vault, forcing disclosure and exposing if NJSP is playing favorites or worse, enabling a two-tiered armed class system.

For the 2A community, the implications are electric—this lawsuit could turbocharge the push for permit parity nationwide. If Petrolino prevails, it sets a precedent dismantling the veil over LEO privileges, arming activists with data to challenge unequal carry laws in courtrooms from Trenton to Sacramento. It’s a reminder that transparency isn’t optional; it’s the sunlight that kills bureaucratic vampires protecting elite exemptions. Gun owners should rally behind this fight, because when journalists like Petrolino bleed for the records, they’re fighting for all of us to level the playing field under the Second Amendment. Stay tuned—this one’s got teeth.

Share this story