NAGR’s Taylor Rhodes on the Gun Rights Outlook for 2026

January 28, 2026
8:00 am

▶

Listen to Article

In the ever-evolving battlefield of Second Amendment rights, few voices cut through the noise like Taylor Rhodes, Communications Director for the National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR). Back in May 2025, as the dust settled from bruising legislative fights and judicial skirmishes, Rhodes sat down for a candid chat that now feels prescient for 2026's gun rights horizon. While the full interview dives into NAGR's top five national priorities—think aggressive counters to ATF overreach, state-level preemption battles, and mobilizing grassroots firepower against creeping red-flag expansions—Rhodes didn't mince words: the outlook is a high-stakes trench war. With a potential lame-duck Congress post-2024 midterms and emboldened anti-gun governors eyeing federal bailouts, NAGR is positioning for victories through vigilance, emphasizing no-compromise litigation and voter turnout over backroom deals. What makes Rhodes' insights gold for the 2A community isn't just the playbook—it's the unapologetic realism. Unlike groups chasing common ground with Bloomberg-funded foes, NAGR's strategy reeks of scorched-earth resolve: sue the feds into oblivion (hello, ongoing pistol brace saga), amplify state wins like Missouri's total preemption, and flood swing districts with ads exposing RINOs. Contextually, this lands amid a Supreme Court still stinging from Rahimi's affirming-but-narrow concealed-carry limits, where Bruen's ghost demands text, history, and tradition from gun-grabbers—who've pivoted to sensitive places blacklists and universal background check Trojan horses. Rhodes flags 2026 as a pivot year: if Republicans hold the House, expect NAGR-pushed reciprocity bills to gain steam; if not, it's fortress-mode with ballot initiatives in purple states. The implications? For pro-2A warriors, this is a rallying cry—don't sleep on local races, because that's where the real erosion happens. NAGR's no-retreat ethos could blunt Biden-era regs carrying into a Harris or Newsom sequel, but it demands your wallet and vote. Rhodes isn't predicting utopia; he's arming us for the grind. Dive into the full interview (linked via the original coverage) and gear up—2026 won't defend itself. Stay vigilant, stay armed.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

What makes Rhodes’ insights gold for the 2A community isn’t just the playbook—it’s the unapologetic realism. Unlike groups chasing common ground with Bloomberg-funded foes, NAGR’s strategy reeks of scorched-earth resolve: sue the feds into oblivion (hello, ongoing pistol brace saga), amplify state wins like Missouri’s total preemption, and flood swing districts with ads exposing RINOs. Contextually, this lands amid a Supreme Court still stinging from Rahimi’s affirming-but-narrow concealed-carry limits, where Bruen’s ghost demands text, history, and tradition from gun-grabbers—who’ve pivoted to sensitive places blacklists and universal background check Trojan horses. Rhodes flags 2026 as a pivot year: if Republicans hold the House, expect NAGR-pushed reciprocity bills to gain steam; if not, it’s fortress-mode with ballot initiatives in purple states.

The implications? For pro-2A warriors, this is a rallying cry—don’t sleep on local races, because that’s where the real erosion happens. NAGR’s no-retreat ethos could blunt Biden-era regs carrying into a Harris or Newsom sequel, but it demands your wallet and vote. Rhodes isn’t predicting utopia; he’s arming us for the grind. Dive into the full interview (linked via the original coverage) and gear up—2026 won’t defend itself. Stay vigilant, stay armed.

Share this story