Hate ads?! Want to be able to search and filter? Day and Night mode? Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Arizona AG Suggests State’s Self-Defense Laws Will Protect #Resistance Types Who Fire on ICE Agents

Listen to Article

If a few people like Renee Good and Alex Pretti take things too far and wind up dead, that’s a shame, but in the cynical calculation of ant-ICE politicians, it’s a small price to pay for the optics of resisting federal authority. That’s the chilling takeaway from Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes’ recent comments, where she floated the idea that the state’s robust self-defense laws—think Stand Your Ground and Castle Doctrine—could shield anti-ICE activists who fire back at federal agents during protests or confrontations. Mayes, a Democrat, didn’t mince words in a local interview, suggesting that if ICE agents cross the line into what locals perceive as their homes or properties, Arizona’s statutes might just provide legal cover for armed resistance. This isn’t hyperbole; it’s a direct nod to cases like the recent New Mexico standoffs where militia-types clashed with feds, but now flipped to protect left-wing agitators.

For the 2A community, this is a double-edged sword wrapped in irony. On one hand, it’s a rare admission from a blue-state AG that self-defense rights aren’t just for deer hunters and home intruders—they apply universally, even to those waving Abolish ICE signs while packing heat. Mayes is essentially arguing that the same laws protecting a rancher from cartel smugglers could extend to urban protesters defending against badge-wearing enforcers of immigration law. We’ve long fought for these protections to be color-blind and absolute, no carve-outs for politics, so kudos to Arizona for consistency. But here’s the rub: this rhetoric greenlights escalation. If antifa cosplayers get a legal hall pass to draw down on feds, it normalizes violence against law enforcement, potentially eroding the sanctity of self-defense claims for all of us. Imagine the precedent—next time a routine traffic stop turns tense, prosecutors could cite this as justified resistance.

The implications ripple far beyond the border. Politicizing self-defense laws like this weaponizes the Second Amendment against itself, turning a cornerstone of liberty into a partisan tool. 2A advocates should call this out not as endorsement, but as a warning: when the left discovers the power of armed self-defense, they’ll stretch it to justify anarchy, from blocking highways to ambushing agents. Stay vigilant—support universal carry rights, push for clarity in statutes, and remind everyone that true resistance starts at the ballot box, not the trigger. Arizona’s AG just handed us a teachable moment: our rights protect the law-abiding, not the ideologues itching for a fight.

Share this story