New Mexico Lawsuit: Meta’s Internal Tests Reveal AI Failed Child Safety Checks

February 17, 2026
3:56 pm

▶

Listen to Article

Imagine a tech behemoth like Meta, with its vast resources and self-proclaimed moral superiority, failing spectacularly at the one job it claims to champion: protecting kids from predators. Internal tests on an unreleased chatbot revealed it flunked child safety checks in nearly 70% of scenarios involving sexual exploitation, as exposed in New Mexico's ongoing lawsuit against the company. This bombshell came via court testimony on Monday, laying bare documents from Mark Zuckerberg's empire that show their AI couldn't even pretend to safeguard minors effectively. It's not just a glitch—it's a glaring indictment of Big Tech's hollow virtue-signaling, where algorithms prioritize engagement over ethics, funneling vulnerable users into digital danger zones. For the 2A community, this isn't some distant Silicon Valley scandal; it's a stark reminder of why we fight tooth and nail for self-reliance and decentralized power. Meta and its ilk lecture us endlessly on safety, pushing for backdoors in encryption, AI censorship of harmful speech (like pro-gun content), and government-mandated surveillance—all under the guise of protecting children. Yet here they are, their own tech failing kids at epidemic levels, exposing the hypocrisy. If these trillion-dollar titans can't be trusted with basic moderation on their platforms, why on earth should we surrender our Second Amendment rights to their unproven, exploitable systems? This lawsuit underscores the peril of outsourcing protection to unaccountable corporations: they peddle fear to disarm us while their AI chatbots greenlight predation. The implications ripple far beyond chatbots. As New Mexico AG Raúl Torrez presses forward, demanding accountability, 2A advocates should seize this moment to highlight how gun rights empower real community defense—neighborhood watches, armed parents at school gates, and personal vigilance—versus relying on glitchy AI overlords. Meta's failure isn't isolated; it's symptomatic of a tech ecosystem that amplifies risks while eroding freedoms. Time to double down: support lawsuits like this, amplify the evidence of Big Tech's incompetence, and remind everyone that the surest child safety check is a free, armed populace, not Zuckerberg's faulty code.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

For the 2A community, this isn’t some distant Silicon Valley scandal; it’s a stark reminder of why we fight tooth and nail for self-reliance and decentralized power. Meta and its ilk lecture us endlessly on safety, pushing for backdoors in encryption, AI censorship of harmful speech (like pro-gun content), and government-mandated surveillance—all under the guise of protecting children. Yet here they are, their own tech failing kids at epidemic levels, exposing the hypocrisy. If these trillion-dollar titans can’t be trusted with basic moderation on their platforms, why on earth should we surrender our Second Amendment rights to their unproven, exploitable systems? This lawsuit underscores the peril of outsourcing protection to unaccountable corporations: they peddle fear to disarm us while their AI chatbots greenlight predation.

The implications ripple far beyond chatbots. As New Mexico AG Raúl Torrez presses forward, demanding accountability, 2A advocates should seize this moment to highlight how gun rights empower real community defense—neighborhood watches, armed parents at school gates, and personal vigilance—versus relying on glitchy AI overlords. Meta’s failure isn’t isolated; it’s symptomatic of a tech ecosystem that amplifies risks while eroding freedoms. Time to double down: support lawsuits like this, amplify the evidence of Big Tech’s incompetence, and remind everyone that the surest child safety check is a free, armed populace, not Zuckerberg’s faulty code.

Share this story