Hate ads?! Want to be able to search and filter? Day and Night mode? Subscribe for just $5 a month!

With Supreme Court Ruling Coming, Hawaii Democrats Push More Carry Restrictions

Listen to Article

Hawaii’s Democrats are pulling out all the stops in a desperate bid to fortify their gun control fortress just as the Supreme Court looms large over their draconian carry restrictions. With the state government staring down the barrel of a pending SCOTUS ruling in a challenge to Hawaii’s notoriously restrictive concealed carry laws—laws that make it nearly impossible for law-abiding citizens to exercise their Second Amendment rights—the blue-state machine is ramming through even tighter measures. This isn’t subtle maneuvering; it’s a full-throated panic move, layering on extra good cause requirements, heightened training mandates, and discretionary permitting hurdles that echo the very may-issue schemes the High Court gutted in Bruen back in 2022. Sources confirm the push is timed perfectly to preempt a potential smackdown, betting that stacking the deck now might buy them time or wiggle room in any remand.

What’s clever—and infuriating—about this play is how it weaponizes judicial uncertainty against the people. Post-Bruen, Hawaii’s regime was already an outlier, treating self-defense as a privilege for the elite rather than a fundamental right, with sheriffs wielding god-like discretion to deny permits. Now, facing a direct challenge that’s all but certain to invoke Bruen’s text-history-and-tradition test (spoiler: Hawaii’s 20th-century edicts don’t pass muster against America’s armed citizenry tradition), Dems are preemptively entrenching barriers. It’s like fortifying a sandcastle against the tide—pointless, but revealing their endgame: total disarmament of the populace outside their utopian bubbles. For the 2A community, this screams urgency; victories in places like New York and California prove the dominoes are falling, but Hawaii’s gambit tests SCOTUS’s resolve to enforce Bruen nationwide.

The implications ripple far beyond the Aloha State. If the Court affirms a shall-issue mandate here, it obliterates the last redoubts of may-issue mayhem, forcing blue enclaves to confront reality: the Second Amendment means what it says, no sensitive places carve-outs or interest-balancing nonsense allowed. But expect foot-dragging, endless litigation, and copycat bills in California or New Jersey if Hawaii dodges a bullet. 2A warriors, this is rally time—support the challengers, flood the docket with amicus briefs, and keep the pressure on. The right to bear arms isn’t negotiable; Hawaii’s just the latest battlefield proving why we fight.

Share this story