Suppressor Reform Signed in South Dakota, $500 Tax Canned in Virginia

February 11, 2026
2:40 am

▶

Listen to Article

Two states, two wildly different paths forward for suppressor rights—welcome to the patchwork quilt of American gun laws in 2024. In South Dakota, Governor Kristi Noem just inked House Bill 1246 into law, stripping away the state's burdensome registration requirements for suppressors and treating them like the hearing protection devices they are. No more state-level hoops to jump through; South Dakotans can now own these tools without the extra red tape, building on the federal Hearing Protection Act's momentum. Meanwhile, across the map in Virginia, hopes for scrapping the infamous $200 NFA tax stamp on suppressors crashed and burned as HB 2 failed to advance in committee. Proponents argued it would end the punitive fee that's stifled ownership since 1934, but anti-gun forces painted suppressors as silencers for assassins, dooming the bill despite bipartisan support in the House. This split isn't just legislative trivia—it's a masterclass in momentum versus inertia for the 2A community. South Dakota's win turbocharges the national push to deregulate suppressors, proving that in red-leaning states, governors like Noem can deliver real reform without waiting for Congress. It's a shot in the arm (pun intended) for groups like the American Suppressor Association, who've chipped away at bans in 12 states already, with more eyeing similar moves. Virginia's flop, though? A stark reminder of purple-state fragility: even with a Republican-led House, Senate Democrats and Governor Youngkin's cautious veto pen stalled progress, highlighting how the NFA's outdated tax—originally a New Deal revenue grab—still funds ATF bureaucracy while pricing out everyday shooters. The implications are electric: expect suppressor sales to spike in South Dakota, pressuring neighbors like North Dakota and Montana to follow suit, while Virginia's loss fuels grassroots fire for 2025's full-court press on national reform. For 2A warriors, the playbook is clear—celebrate the W's to build unstoppable momentum, but double down on flipping battlegrounds like Virginia. Suppressors aren't gangster gadgets; they're OSHA-compliant earplugs for the range, and victories like South Dakota's prove the tide is turning. If you're in a free state, grab that Form 4 and celebrate. If not, hit the phones—next session could be yours. Stay vigilant, stay armed.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

This split isn’t just legislative trivia—it’s a masterclass in momentum versus inertia for the 2A community. South Dakota’s win turbocharges the national push to deregulate suppressors, proving that in red-leaning states, governors like Noem can deliver real reform without waiting for Congress. It’s a shot in the arm (pun intended) for groups like the American Suppressor Association, who’ve chipped away at bans in 12 states already, with more eyeing similar moves. Virginia’s flop, though? A stark reminder of purple-state fragility: even with a Republican-led House, Senate Democrats and Governor Youngkin’s cautious veto pen stalled progress, highlighting how the NFA’s outdated tax—originally a New Deal revenue grab—still funds ATF bureaucracy while pricing out everyday shooters. The implications are electric: expect suppressor sales to spike in South Dakota, pressuring neighbors like North Dakota and Montana to follow suit, while Virginia’s loss fuels grassroots fire for 2025’s full-court press on national reform.

For 2A warriors, the playbook is clear—celebrate the W’s to build unstoppable momentum, but double down on flipping battlegrounds like Virginia. Suppressors aren’t gangster gadgets; they’re OSHA-compliant earplugs for the range, and victories like South Dakota’s prove the tide is turning. If you’re in a free state, grab that Form 4 and celebrate. If not, hit the phones—next session could be yours. Stay vigilant, stay armed.

Share this story