Seventh Circuit Hears Unusual Case Regarding Right to Carry

February 27, 2026
9:00 pm

▶

Listen to Article

In a courtroom drama that's equal parts constitutional showdown and psychedelic twist, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals just heard arguments in an unusual challenge to Wisconsin's concealed carry denial regime. At the heart of *United States v. Reese* is David Reese, a man hit with a felony conviction for delivery of peyote—yes, that peyote, the Schedule I hallucinogen sacred to some Native American rituals but criminalized under federal law. Despite completing his sentence over a decade ago, Wisconsin's strict felon-in-possession laws barred him from exercising his Second Amendment right to carry concealed, prompting this federal appeal. The state's argument hinges on treating all felonies as lifetime disarmament triggers, but Reese's team counters that peyote delivery is a non-violent, victimless regulatory offense, not the stuff of Bruen's sensitive places or Heller's core protections. This isn't just a quirky footnote; it's a litmus test for how post-Bruen courts dissect dangerous felons from the merely naughty ones. Remember, the Supreme Court's 2022 Bruen decision demanded text, history, and tradition for gun restrictions, blowing up interest-balancing tests that let states blanket-ban carry for anyone with a felony rap sheet. Peyote delivery? No victims, no violence—it's more akin to outdated drug regs than armed robbery. If the Seventh Circuit sides with Reese, it could crack open doors for thousands of non-violent ex-felons nationwide, forcing states like Wisconsin to justify lifetime bans with historical analogs (good luck finding 1791 precedents for mescaline trafficking). Critics in the anti-gun crowd will cry public safety, but data from shall-issue states shows concealed carry permittees, even reformed felons, have lower crime rates than the general population—think John Lott's research, not Brady Campaign spin. For the 2A community, the stakes are sky-high: a win here ripples beyond the Heartland, pressuring circuits like the Ninth and Eleventh to revisit their own disarmament overreaches. It's a reminder that the right to bear arms isn't forfeited on a technicality—especially when the crime involves a cactus. Eyes on the Seventh Circuit's ruling; this could be the velvet hammer that expands carry rights without firing a shot. Stay vigilant, patriots—your holster might depend on it.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

In a courtroom drama that’s equal parts constitutional showdown and psychedelic twist, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals just heard arguments in an unusual challenge to Wisconsin’s concealed carry denial regime. At the heart of *United States v. Reese* is David Reese, a man hit with a felony conviction for delivery of peyote—yes, that peyote, the Schedule I hallucinogen sacred to some Native American rituals but criminalized under federal law. Despite completing his sentence over a decade ago, Wisconsin’s strict felon-in-possession laws barred him from exercising his Second Amendment right to carry concealed, prompting this federal appeal. The state’s argument hinges on treating all felonies as lifetime disarmament triggers, but Reese’s team counters that peyote delivery is a non-violent, victimless regulatory offense, not the stuff of Bruen’s sensitive places or Heller’s core protections.

This isn’t just a quirky footnote; it’s a litmus test for how post-Bruen courts dissect dangerous felons from the merely naughty ones. Remember, the Supreme Court’s 2022 Bruen decision demanded text, history, and tradition for gun restrictions, blowing up interest-balancing tests that let states blanket-ban carry for anyone with a felony rap sheet. Peyote delivery? No victims, no violence—it’s more akin to outdated drug regs than armed robbery. If the Seventh Circuit sides with Reese, it could crack open doors for thousands of non-violent ex-felons nationwide, forcing states like Wisconsin to justify lifetime bans with historical analogs (good luck finding 1791 precedents for mescaline trafficking). Critics in the anti-gun crowd will cry public safety, but data from shall-issue states shows concealed carry permittees, even reformed felons, have lower crime rates than the general population—think John Lott’s research, not Brady Campaign spin.

For the 2A community, the stakes are sky-high: a win here ripples beyond the Heartland, pressuring circuits like the Ninth and Eleventh to revisit their own disarmament overreaches. It’s a reminder that the right to bear arms isn’t forfeited on a technicality—especially when the crime involves a cactus. Eyes on the Seventh Circuit’s ruling; this could be the velvet hammer that expands carry rights without firing a shot. Stay vigilant, patriots—your holster might depend on it.

Share this story