Hate ads?! Want to be able to search and filter? Day and Night mode? Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Second Amendment Foundation, NRA Files Brief Supporting Gun Owners’ Privacy in Civil Lawsuit

Listen to Article

In a bold stand against the creeping erosion of Second Amendment rights, the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and the National Rifle Association (NRA) have teamed up to file a critical amicus brief in a Sig Sauer product liability lawsuit, championing the privacy of everyday gun owners. At its core, this case revolves around plaintiffs suing Sig Sauer over alleged defects in their popular P320 pistol—a platform that’s become a staple for concealed carriers and home defenders alike. But here’s where it gets spicy: the plaintiffs’ legal team is demanding access to defendants’ personal purchase records, serial numbers, and other firearm registry data from state databases. SAF and NRA aren’t just dipping a toe in; they’re diving headfirst, arguing that handing over this info sets a dangerous precedent for government overreach and private-sector fishing expeditions into law-abiding citizens’ arsenals.

This isn’t some abstract legal tussle—it’s a frontline battle in the war for 2A privacy. Think about it: if courts greenlight this discovery tactic, every future lawsuit, no matter how frivolous, could become a backdoor to your NICS transaction history or concealed carry logs. We’ve already seen states like California and New York build de facto registries under the guise of public safety, and now plaintiffs’ attorneys want to tap that vein in civil courts? SAF and NRA’s brief cleverly frames it as a Fourth Amendment violation in disguise, protecting not just Sig Sauer customers but every gun owner from being treated like a criminal suspect. Their argument draws on precedents like the Supreme Court’s rejection of universal background check mandates in *NYSRPA v. Bruen*, emphasizing that privacy isn’t a luxury—it’s foundational to exercising your rights without Big Brother (or trial lawyers) peering over your shoulder.

The implications for the 2A community are massive: a win here fortifies barriers against data dumps that fuel red-flag laws, confiscation schemes, and stalkerish litigation. It signals to manufacturers like Sig Sauer that allies have their back, potentially stabilizing an industry battered by activist suits. Gun owners, take note—this is why we support orgs like SAF and NRA; they’re not just talking rights, they’re litigating them. Stay vigilant, share this fight, and keep your powder dry—because privacy today means liberty tomorrow.

Share this story