Hate ads?! Want to be able to search and filter? Day and Night mode? Subscribe for just $5 a month!

SAF FILES AMICUS CHALLENGING NFA’S REGISTRATION AND TAXATION OF SUPPRESSORS

Listen to Article

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) just dropped a legal bombshell in Bellevue, Washington, filing an amicus brief that directly challenges the National Firearms Act’s (NFA) burdensome registration and $200 tax stamp on suppressors. This isn’t some fringe filing—it’s a calculated strike at the heart of one of the most archaic and nonsensical regulations in American gun law, arguing that these silencer taxes and registries violate the Second Amendment as clarified by Bruen. SAF, fresh off victories like the Illinois concealed carry win, is teaming up with heavy hitters to remind courts that hearing protection shouldn’t require jumping through ATF hoops or forking over Benjamin Franklins for a device that’s as American as apple pie and range days.

Let’s break it down: Suppressors aren’t movie-villain gadgets; they’re engineering marvels that slash noise pollution at the range, protect shooters’ hearing, and make training safer without altering a firearm’s lethality. The NFA slapped them with this punitive regime in 1934 to curb gangsters, but today’s reality? Over 3 million law-abiding owners endure 8-12 month wait times and invasive paperwork, all while states like Minnesota and Iowa have already legalized them sans NFA shackles. SAF’s brief cleverly leverages Bruen’s text-history-and-tradition test, pointing out zero historical analogs for taxing or registering hearing protection—it’s like fining someone for wearing earplugs at a concert. This builds on GOA’s ongoing suppressor cases and signals a multi-front assault, potentially freeing suppressors (and maybe short-barreled rifles) from NFA purgatory.

For the 2A community, the implications are electric: A win here could Shred the $200 tax across the board, turbocharge the Hearing Protection Act’s revival, and normalize suppressors nationwide overnight. Picture ranges without the deafening crack, new shooters sticking with the sport longer, and the ATF’s registry empire crumbling under constitutional scrutiny. SAF’s move isn’t just litigation—it’s momentum. Gun owners, keep your eyes on this docket; the quiet revolution is heating up, and it might just hush the critics for good. Stay vigilant, support SAF, and let’s make suppressors as straightforward as buying a holster.

Share this story