Minnesota’s Proposed Assault Weapon Ban an Assault on Multiple Constituitional Rights

February 24, 2026
8:41 am

▶

Listen to Article

Minnesota's latest legislative push for an assault weapon ban isn't just another gun-grabber fever dream—it's a full-frontal assault on multiple constitutional rights, masquerading as public safety theater. The proposal slaps draconian restrictions on semi-automatic firearms, redefining assault weapons with the usual suspects: pistol grips, folding stocks, and those scary-looking features that make leftists clutch their pearls. But dig deeper, and this isn't solely about the Second Amendment; it's a sneaky siege on the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments too. By criminalizing possession of commonly owned rifles like the AR-15—used in a tiny fraction of crimes compared to handguns or fists—this bill chills free speech through vague, overbroad language that could ensnare hobbyists, collectors, and even journalists critiquing the law. It's compelled speech in reverse: conform your arsenal or face felony charges, echoing the due process violations seen in past confiscation schemes. Context matters here, and Minnesota's not inventing the wheel—it's recycling failed blueprints from states like California and New York, where bans have done zilch to curb violence but skyrocketed black-market premiums and compliance costs. Post-Bruen (the Supreme Court's 2022 smackdown of may-issue permitting), these red-flag replicas ignore history and tradition, the very tests the Court mandated for gun laws. Implications for the 2A community? Mobilize now. This could grandfather existing owners but grandfather-in new vulnerabilities: burdensome registrations, suppressed innovation in firearms tech, and a precedent for nationwide creep if blue states stack the deck. We've seen it before—Illinois's recent ban is tied up in courts, but delays cost lives by disarming law-abiding folks. Patriots in the Twin Cities and beyond, flood your reps, join the lawsuits brewing from groups like the Second Amendment Foundation, and vote like your rights depend on it—because they do. The silver lining? Pushback is fierce. Minnesota's GOP lawmakers and grassroots orgs like Guns Across America are rallying, exposing how this ban disproportionately hammers working-class hunters and sport shooters while cartels laugh with untraceable ghost guns. If it passes, expect a constitutional showdown that could ripple to swing states, reinforcing Bruen's legacy. Stay vigilant, armed, and informed—this isn't hyperbole; it's the slow boil toward incremental disarmament. Your move, gun owners.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

Minnesota’s latest legislative push for an assault weapon ban isn’t just another gun-grabber fever dream—it’s a full-frontal assault on multiple constitutional rights, masquerading as public safety theater. The proposal slaps draconian restrictions on semi-automatic firearms, redefining assault weapons with the usual suspects: pistol grips, folding stocks, and those scary-looking features that make leftists clutch their pearls. But dig deeper, and this isn’t solely about the Second Amendment; it’s a sneaky siege on the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments too. By criminalizing possession of commonly owned rifles like the AR-15—used in a tiny fraction of crimes compared to handguns or fists—this bill chills free speech through vague, overbroad language that could ensnare hobbyists, collectors, and even journalists critiquing the law. It’s compelled speech in reverse: conform your arsenal or face felony charges, echoing the due process violations seen in past confiscation schemes.

Context matters here, and Minnesota’s not inventing the wheel—it’s recycling failed blueprints from states like California and New York, where bans have done zilch to curb violence but skyrocketed black-market premiums and compliance costs. Post-Bruen (the Supreme Court’s 2022 smackdown of may-issue permitting), these red-flag replicas ignore history and tradition, the very tests the Court mandated for gun laws. Implications for the 2A community? Mobilize now. This could grandfather existing owners but grandfather-in new vulnerabilities: burdensome registrations, suppressed innovation in firearms tech, and a precedent for nationwide creep if blue states stack the deck. We’ve seen it before—Illinois’s recent ban is tied up in courts, but delays cost lives by disarming law-abiding folks. Patriots in the Twin Cities and beyond, flood your reps, join the lawsuits brewing from groups like the Second Amendment Foundation, and vote like your rights depend on it—because they do.

The silver lining? Pushback is fierce. Minnesota’s GOP lawmakers and grassroots orgs like Guns Across America are rallying, exposing how this ban disproportionately hammers working-class hunters and sport shooters while cartels laugh with untraceable ghost guns. If it passes, expect a constitutional showdown that could ripple to swing states, reinforcing Bruen’s legacy. Stay vigilant, armed, and informed—this isn’t hyperbole; it’s the slow boil toward incremental disarmament. Your move, gun owners.

Share this story