Minnesota Struggles to Defend Switchblade Ban at Summary Judgment Hearing

April 28, 2026
8:11 am

▶

Listen to Article

In a courtroom showdown that's got the 2A world buzzing, Knife Rights just scored a major procedural win against Minnesota's outdated switchblade ban, as a federal judge openly questioned the state's flimsy defenses during a summary judgment hearing. Knife Rights' sharp-shooting attorney John Dillon laid out a airtight constitutional case, framing switchblades—owned by millions nationwide and legal in 47 states—as arms squarely protected under the Second Amendment per Bruen's text-history-and-tradition test. The state, meanwhile, fumbled hard, recycling tired public safety tropes without a shred of historical precedent or data showing switchblades are uniquely dangerous compared to legal folders or fixed blades. Judge Tunheim's skepticism was palpable, signaling the ban's days might be numbered. This isn't just about flicking a blade; it's a Bruen-fueled battering ram against categorical carry bans that treat everyday tools like contraband. Minnesota's law, a relic from the 1950s switchblade panic hyped by movies and moral panics, ignores modern realities where switchblades are ubiquitous for hunters, EDC enthusiasts, and first responders. The state's argument boiled down to trust us, they're scary, but with no evidence of disproportionate crime rates—switchblades barely register in FBI stats—this echoes the failed rationales behind New York's assault weapon ban, now eviscerated post-Bruen. Knife Rights' victory here builds momentum from wins in New York and elsewhere, proving that arms extend beyond guns to the blades our founders carried. For the 2A community, the implications are electric: expect ripple effects dismantling other knife restrictions in blue states, reinforcing that the right to bear arms isn't limited to firearms. As Dillon hammered home, if switchblades fall, so might bans on karambits, balisongs, or even autos in places like California. This hearing isn't the endgame—summary judgment motions are pending—but it's a stark reminder that history, not hysteria, now governs. Gun owners, knife carriers: sharpen your advocacy; the tide's turning one flick at a time. Stay tuned to Knife Rights for updates, and keep fighting the good fight.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

In a courtroom showdown that’s got the 2A world buzzing, Knife Rights just scored a major procedural win against Minnesota’s outdated switchblade ban, as a federal judge openly questioned the state’s flimsy defenses during a summary judgment hearing. Knife Rights’ sharp-shooting attorney John Dillon laid out a airtight constitutional case, framing switchblades—owned by millions nationwide and legal in 47 states—as arms squarely protected under the Second Amendment per Bruen’s text-history-and-tradition test. The state, meanwhile, fumbled hard, recycling tired public safety tropes without a shred of historical precedent or data showing switchblades are uniquely dangerous compared to legal folders or fixed blades. Judge Tunheim’s skepticism was palpable, signaling the ban’s days might be numbered.

This isn’t just about flicking a blade; it’s a Bruen-fueled battering ram against categorical carry bans that treat everyday tools like contraband. Minnesota’s law, a relic from the 1950s switchblade panic hyped by movies and moral panics, ignores modern realities where switchblades are ubiquitous for hunters, EDC enthusiasts, and first responders. The state’s argument boiled down to trust us, they’re scary, but with no evidence of disproportionate crime rates—switchblades barely register in FBI stats—this echoes the failed rationales behind New York’s assault weapon ban, now eviscerated post-Bruen. Knife Rights’ victory here builds momentum from wins in New York and elsewhere, proving that arms extend beyond guns to the blades our founders carried.

For the 2A community, the implications are electric: expect ripple effects dismantling other knife restrictions in blue states, reinforcing that the right to bear arms isn’t limited to firearms. As Dillon hammered home, if switchblades fall, so might bans on karambits, balisongs, or even autos in places like California. This hearing isn’t the endgame—summary judgment motions are pending—but it’s a stark reminder that history, not hysteria, now governs. Gun owners, knife carriers: sharpen your advocacy; the tide’s turning one flick at a time. Stay tuned to Knife Rights for updates, and keep fighting the good fight.

Share this story