Minnesota Anti-2A Activists Lash Out After Gun, Magazine Ban Bills Rejected in Committee

February 25, 2026
1:51 pm

▶

Listen to Article

In a decisive victory for Second Amendment defenders, a Minnesota legislative committee has shot down two radical bills that would have imposed sweeping bans on commonly owned firearms and standard-capacity magazines. The rejection came amid fierce pushback from pro-2A activists, lawmakers, and everyday gun owners who packed the hearings with impassioned testimony exposing the bills' flaws. Anti-gun groups, led by figures like those from Everytown for Gun Safety, are now lashing out in fury, accusing opponents of being extremists while conveniently ignoring how these measures would criminalize millions of law-abiding Minnesotans overnight. This isn't just a procedural win—it's a stark reminder that the tide is turning against the incremental erosion of our rights. Digging deeper, these bills (HF 2907 and SF 2904) mirrored failed assaults in states like California and New York, targeting AR-15s, AK-pattern rifles, and magazines holding more than 10 rounds—tools essential for self-defense, hunting, and sport shooting. Proponents peddled the usual emotional appeals, but data demolished their case: FBI stats show rifles of any kind are used in just 3% of murders, while assault weapon bans elsewhere haven't reduced crime. Minnesota lawmakers, including Republicans and even some Democrats wary of voter backlash, recognized the overreach. This echoes recent court smackdowns like *Rahimi* clarifications and *Bruen*'s emphasis on historical tradition, forcing gun-grabbers to confront that public safety doesn't mean stripping rights from the law-abiding. For the 2A community, the implications are electric: it signals growing fatigue with fearmongering post-2024 elections, where pro-gun majorities flexed muscle. Activists should capitalize by flooding districts with voter education on concealed carry's proven deterrent effect (crimes drop 4-7% per studies from John Lott) and prepping for veto-proof majorities. Meanwhile, Minnesota's rejection emboldens neighbors like Wisconsin and Iowa to fortify protections. Stay vigilant—the antis will regroup, but momentum favors freedom. Gear up, organize, and keep the pressure on.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

Digging deeper, these bills (HF 2907 and SF 2904) mirrored failed assaults in states like California and New York, targeting AR-15s, AK-pattern rifles, and magazines holding more than 10 rounds—tools essential for self-defense, hunting, and sport shooting. Proponents peddled the usual emotional appeals, but data demolished their case: FBI stats show rifles of any kind are used in just 3% of murders, while assault weapon bans elsewhere haven’t reduced crime. Minnesota lawmakers, including Republicans and even some Democrats wary of voter backlash, recognized the overreach. This echoes recent court smackdowns like *Rahimi* clarifications and *Bruen*’s emphasis on historical tradition, forcing gun-grabbers to confront that public safety doesn’t mean stripping rights from the law-abiding.

For the 2A community, the implications are electric: it signals growing fatigue with fearmongering post-2024 elections, where pro-gun majorities flexed muscle. Activists should capitalize by flooding districts with voter education on concealed carry’s proven deterrent effect (crimes drop 4-7% per studies from John Lott) and prepping for veto-proof majorities. Meanwhile, Minnesota’s rejection emboldens neighbors like Wisconsin and Iowa to fortify protections. Stay vigilant—the antis will regroup, but momentum favors freedom. Gear up, organize, and keep the pressure on.

Share this story