Florida AG Argues Nonviolent Felons Shouldn’t Lose Their Gun Rights

March 29, 2026
7:30 am

▶

Listen to Article

Florida's Attorney General Ashley Moody just dropped a legal bombshell in a federal court brief that's got 2A advocates buzzing: nonviolent felons shouldn't automatically lose their Second Amendment rights. Leaning hard on the Supreme Court's Bruen decision and its text-and-history test, the filing argues that historical traditions from the Founding era simply don't support blanket disarmament for folks convicted of nonviolent crimes like drug possession or check fraud. Moody's team points out that while the Framers disarmed dangerous individuals—think loyalists or those who refused to swear allegiance—there's zero evidence of lifetime bans for garden-variety offenders who pose no ongoing threat. This isn't some radical overreach; it's a direct challenge to the post-Heller patchwork where states like Florida strip rights from people who've long paid their debt to society. The implications here are massive for the gun rights community. If this argument gains traction—and with SCOTUS's recent emphasis on history over modern interest-balancing tests, it just might—it could crack open the felon-in-possession statutes that disarm millions of Americans for victimless crimes. Think about it: under current federal law (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)), even a decades-old misdemeanor-level felony can turn a law-abiding citizen into a prohibited person overnight. Florida's push aligns with emerging wins like the Fifth Circuit's Rahimi reversal (pre-Supreme Court affirmance) and cases chipping away at nonviolent prohibitions, signaling a seismic shift. For 2A warriors, this is red meat—reinforcing that the right to keep and bear arms isn't a privilege revoked by bureaucratic fiat but a constitutional bedrock tied to actual public safety risks. Bottom line: Moody's brief isn't just defending Floridians; it's a blueprint for nationwide reform. As more circuits apply Bruen rigorously, expect copycat challenges in red and purple states alike, potentially restoring rights to everyday folks who've reformed. This could be the domino that topples lifetime disarmament for the non-dangerous, proving once again that history is on our side. Stay locked and loaded—victories like this don't happen by accident.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

Florida’s Attorney General Ashley Moody just dropped a legal bombshell in a federal court brief that’s got 2A advocates buzzing: nonviolent felons shouldn’t automatically lose their Second Amendment rights. Leaning hard on the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision and its text-and-history test, the filing argues that historical traditions from the Founding era simply don’t support blanket disarmament for folks convicted of nonviolent crimes like drug possession or check fraud. Moody’s team points out that while the Framers disarmed dangerous individuals—think loyalists or those who refused to swear allegiance—there’s zero evidence of lifetime bans for garden-variety offenders who pose no ongoing threat. This isn’t some radical overreach; it’s a direct challenge to the post-Heller patchwork where states like Florida strip rights from people who’ve long paid their debt to society.

The implications here are massive for the gun rights community. If this argument gains traction—and with SCOTUS’s recent emphasis on history over modern interest-balancing tests, it just might—it could crack open the felon-in-possession statutes that disarm millions of Americans for victimless crimes. Think about it: under current federal law (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)), even a decades-old misdemeanor-level felony can turn a law-abiding citizen into a prohibited person overnight. Florida’s push aligns with emerging wins like the Fifth Circuit’s Rahimi reversal (pre-Supreme Court affirmance) and cases chipping away at nonviolent prohibitions, signaling a seismic shift. For 2A warriors, this is red meat—reinforcing that the right to keep and bear arms isn’t a privilege revoked by bureaucratic fiat but a constitutional bedrock tied to actual public safety risks.

Bottom line: Moody’s brief isn’t just defending Floridians; it’s a blueprint for nationwide reform. As more circuits apply Bruen rigorously, expect copycat challenges in red and purple states alike, potentially restoring rights to everyday folks who’ve reformed. This could be the domino that topples lifetime disarmament for the non-dangerous, proving once again that history is on our side. Stay locked and loaded—victories like this don’t happen by accident.

Share this story