Et Tu, Pirro? U.S. Attorney Rebuked By 2A Groups After Carry Comments

February 3, 2026
4:47 pm

▶

Listen to Article

In a stunning twist that's got the 2A world buzzing, U.S. Attorney Danielle Pirro—yes, that Pirro, with the family legacy in law enforcement—is catching heat from gun rights heavyweights like the NRA and Gun Owners of America after dropping some eyebrow-raising comments on concealed carry during a D.C. panel. Speaking at what was supposed to be a routine discussion on public safety, Pirro suggested that everyday folks shouldn't need to carry concealed firearms in urban areas, arguing it complicates law enforcement's job and escalates risks. Why do you need a gun in the city? she reportedly quipped, echoing the tired anti-carry rhetoric we've heard from blue-city prosecutors for years. But coming from a federal prosecutor sworn to uphold the Constitution, including Bruen's landmark affirmation of carry rights, this landed like a misfired round—prompting swift rebukes that label her views ignorant of Supreme Court precedent and a betrayal of oath. Let's unpack this: Pirro's remarks aren't just off-base; they're a symptom of the elite disconnect plaguing DoJ ranks post-Bruen. The 2022 Supreme Court decision obliterated may-issue schemes, mandating that states treat concealed carry as a presumptive right for law-abiding citizens. Yet here we have a U.S. Attorney in the belly of the beast—D.C., where carry permits are rarer than honest politicians—casually undermining that ruling. It's clever politics for her D.C. audience, sure, but a massive own-goal for 2A credibility. Critics point out the hypocrisy: federal prosecutors like Pirro carry sidearms daily under USAM guidelines, while lecturing civilians on their Heller-protected rights. This isn't abstract; it's personal for the millions who've navigated post-Bruen permitting wars, from New York's endless delays to Illinois' foot-dragging. The implications for the 2A community? Rallying cry material. Groups are already mobilizing petitions and FOIA requests into Pirro's office, demanding clarification and potentially teeing up congressional oversight. If U.S. Attorneys start freelancing anti-carry takes, it greenlights lower courts to slow-walk Bruen compliance, eroding nationwide reciprocity dreams. Pro-2A warriors, take note: this is why we stay vigilant— even friendly insiders can turn. Et tu, Pirro? Time to remind her that the Second Amendment doesn't pause at city limits. Stay armed, informed, and unapologetic.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

In a stunning twist that’s got the 2A world buzzing, U.S. Attorney Danielle Pirro—yes, that Pirro, with the family legacy in law enforcement—is catching heat from gun rights heavyweights like the NRA and Gun Owners of America after dropping some eyebrow-raising comments on concealed carry during a D.C. panel. Speaking at what was supposed to be a routine discussion on public safety, Pirro suggested that everyday folks shouldn’t need to carry concealed firearms in urban areas, arguing it complicates law enforcement’s job and escalates risks. Why do you need a gun in the city? she reportedly quipped, echoing the tired anti-carry rhetoric we’ve heard from blue-city prosecutors for years. But coming from a federal prosecutor sworn to uphold the Constitution, including Bruen’s landmark affirmation of carry rights, this landed like a misfired round—prompting swift rebukes that label her views ignorant of Supreme Court precedent and a betrayal of oath.

Let’s unpack this: Pirro’s remarks aren’t just off-base; they’re a symptom of the elite disconnect plaguing DoJ ranks post-Bruen. The 2022 Supreme Court decision obliterated may-issue schemes, mandating that states treat concealed carry as a presumptive right for law-abiding citizens. Yet here we have a U.S. Attorney in the belly of the beast—D.C., where carry permits are rarer than honest politicians—casually undermining that ruling. It’s clever politics for her D.C. audience, sure, but a massive own-goal for 2A credibility. Critics point out the hypocrisy: federal prosecutors like Pirro carry sidearms daily under USAM guidelines, while lecturing civilians on their Heller-protected rights. This isn’t abstract; it’s personal for the millions who’ve navigated post-Bruen permitting wars, from New York’s endless delays to Illinois’ foot-dragging.

The implications for the 2A community? Rallying cry material. Groups are already mobilizing petitions and FOIA requests into Pirro’s office, demanding clarification and potentially teeing up congressional oversight. If U.S. Attorneys start freelancing anti-carry takes, it greenlights lower courts to slow-walk Bruen compliance, eroding nationwide reciprocity dreams. Pro-2A warriors, take note: this is why we stay vigilant— even friendly insiders can turn. Et tu, Pirro? Time to remind her that the Second Amendment doesn’t pause at city limits. Stay armed, informed, and unapologetic.

Share this story