U.N. in Drive for Centralised Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence

February 20, 2026
7:01 am

▶

Listen to Article

Imagine a world where the same bureaucrats who can't agree on a pizza topping for lunch are now gunning for total control over artificial intelligence—the tech that's revolutionizing everything from smart rifles to predictive policing algorithms. That's the dystopian pitch from U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres, who just unveiled a new panel tasked with imposing centralized global governance on AI. No opt-outs, no national sovereignty; just one world body calling all the shots on how this game-changing technology gets developed and deployed. It's being framed as a noble quest for safety and ethics, but peel back the layers, and it's a power grab straight out of a sci-fi thriller, where innovation bows to international edict. For the 2A community, this isn't some abstract geek fest—it's a direct threat to the tools and tech that keep the right to self-defense ahead of the curve. AI is already powering next-gen firearms training sims, ballistic calculators that outsmart government databases, and even facial recognition jammers for privacy hawks. Centralized U.N. control means algorithms scrutinized through the lens of globalist disarmament agendas, potentially kneecapping pro-2A innovations while greenlighting surveillance states. Remember how the U.N.'s Arms Trade Treaty tried (and failed) to micromanage guns? This is that on steroids, with AI as the Trojan horse. If they dictate AI ethics, expect responsible coding that flags 2A advocacy as hate speech or throttles development of autonomous defense systems—leaving law-abiding Americans one step behind tyrannical regimes that ignore the rules. The implications scream urgency: decentralize now. Support open-source AI projects, back U.S. legislation shielding domestic innovation from U.N. overreach, and rally the 2A ecosystem to frame AI as an extension of individual liberty, not a collectivist plaything. History shows centralized control crushes freedom—whether it's ink on arms treaties or code in neural nets. Time to draw a line in the silicon sand before Guterres's panel turns the future into a global cage. Stay vigilant, patriots; your right to bear arms might soon depend on your right to bear code.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

Imagine a world where the same bureaucrats who can’t agree on a pizza topping for lunch are now gunning for total control over artificial intelligence—the tech that’s revolutionizing everything from smart rifles to predictive policing algorithms. That’s the dystopian pitch from U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres, who just unveiled a new panel tasked with imposing centralized global governance on AI. No opt-outs, no national sovereignty; just one world body calling all the shots on how this game-changing technology gets developed and deployed. It’s being framed as a noble quest for safety and ethics, but peel back the layers, and it’s a power grab straight out of a sci-fi thriller, where innovation bows to international edict.

For the 2A community, this isn’t some abstract geek fest—it’s a direct threat to the tools and tech that keep the right to self-defense ahead of the curve. AI is already powering next-gen firearms training sims, ballistic calculators that outsmart government databases, and even facial recognition jammers for privacy hawks. Centralized U.N. control means algorithms scrutinized through the lens of globalist disarmament agendas, potentially kneecapping pro-2A innovations while greenlighting surveillance states. Remember how the U.N.’s Arms Trade Treaty tried (and failed) to micromanage guns? This is that on steroids, with AI as the Trojan horse. If they dictate AI ethics, expect responsible coding that flags 2A advocacy as hate speech or throttles development of autonomous defense systems—leaving law-abiding Americans one step behind tyrannical regimes that ignore the rules.

The implications scream urgency: decentralize now. Support open-source AI projects, back U.S. legislation shielding domestic innovation from U.N. overreach, and rally the 2A ecosystem to frame AI as an extension of individual liberty, not a collectivist plaything. History shows centralized control crushes freedom—whether it’s ink on arms treaties or code in neural nets. Time to draw a line in the silicon sand before Guterres’s panel turns the future into a global cage. Stay vigilant, patriots; your right to bear arms might soon depend on your right to bear code.

Share this story