Hate ads?! Want to be able to search and filter? Day and Night mode? Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Supreme Court Rules 8-1 Against Colorado Law Banning So-Called ‘Conversion Therapy’

Listen to Article

In a resounding 8-1 smackdown, the Supreme Court just torched Colorado’s draconian ban on so-called conversion therapy, a law that criminalized therapists helping minors reconcile their gender confusion with biological facts. This isn’t just a win for free speech and parental rights—it’s a masterclass in judicial restraint, with the Court vacating a 10th Circuit ruling that had upheld the ban as not violating the First Amendment. Justice Sotomayor was the lone dissenter, but even she couldn’t stem the tide of common sense. The decision underscores that states can’t cloak ideological censorship in the garb of protecting kids, especially when it tramples licensed professionals’ rights to practice evidence-based talk therapy.

Digging deeper, this ruling echoes the free speech bulwarks of cases like NIFLA v. Becerra (2018), where the Court struck down California’s targeted regulations on crisis pregnancy centers—much like how anti-2A states try to bury gun rights under public safety pretexts. Colorado’s law was a blatant content-based restriction, punishing speech that didn’t toe the gender-affirming line, no different from Big Tech shadowbanning or ATF letter rulings reclassifying your AR-15 as a machinegun without due process. For the 2A community, the implications are electric: this fortifies challenges to assault weapon bans and red flag laws that preemptively strip rights based on subjective threat assessments. If the Court won’t let therapists be gagged for harmful words, it sets a precedent to shred firearm registries or sensitivity training mandates disguised as safety measures.

The ripple effects? Expect emboldened lawsuits dismantling similar nanny-state edicts nationwide, from California’s ghost gun rules to New York’s SAFE Act speech codes. Pro-2A warriors should cheer—this isn’t peripheral culture war noise; it’s a direct analog to defending your right to bear arms against therapeutic disarmament. As states like Illinois and New Jersey push mental health carve-outs to confiscate firearms, today’s ruling arms us with Supreme Court ammo: government can’t redefine reality to justify control. Lock and load for the counteroffensive.

Share this story