Nolte: Rachel Good and Alex Pretti Died for an Amoral Cause

January 26, 2026
10:57 am

▶

Listen to Article

Whatever the outcome of the Alex Pretti shooting investigation, one undeniable truth stands out: both Pretti and Rachel Good lost their lives championing an amoral cause that pits emotion against the hard realities of self-defense and public safety. For the uninitiated, Good was the activist gunned down in March 2024 during a chaotic anti-ICE protest in Paramount, California, where she and her comrades escalated tensions by blocking federal agents and hurling objects—only for the situation to spiral into tragedy when a Border Patrol agent fired in response to perceived threats. Pretti, meanwhile, met his end in a July 2024 confrontation with police in North Carolina, where bodycam footage reveals him aggressively charging officers with a knife after ignoring repeated de-escalation commands. These weren't victims of systemic oppression; they were ideologues whose reckless activism glorified lawlessness under the guise of justice, dying not as martyrs but as cautionary tales of hubris. Digging deeper, this duo exemplifies the left's dangerous fetishization of confrontation over constitutional order, a mindset that directly undermines the Second Amendment's foundational role in preserving individual liberty against both tyrants and mobs. Good's death, spun by media as a BLM-style injustice, actually underscores why armed citizens and law enforcement need robust self-defense rights—had agents been disarmed by progressive defund rhetoric, the outcome might've been far bloodier for innocents. Pretti's knife-wielding lunacy mirrors the mostly peaceful protests that torched cities in 2020, reminding 2A advocates that the right to keep and bear arms isn't just for hunters or sport; it's the ultimate backstop against the very anarchy these activists provoke. Nolte nails it: their cause is amoral because it prioritizes performative rage over human life, eroding the rule of law that the Founders enshrined firearms to protect. For the 2A community, the implications are crystal clear—double down on messaging that frames gun rights as the antidote to such chaos. As investigations wrap and narratives twist, use this as Exhibit A: disarmed societies breed vulnerability, while armed ones deter the kind of vigilante theater that claimed Good and Pretti. Share the clips, call out the spin, and vote accordingly; the right to self-preservation isn't negotiable, no matter how many blue-haired revolutionaries romanticize their own demise.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

Digging deeper, this duo exemplifies the left’s dangerous fetishization of confrontation over constitutional order, a mindset that directly undermines the Second Amendment’s foundational role in preserving individual liberty against both tyrants and mobs. Good’s death, spun by media as a BLM-style injustice, actually underscores why armed citizens and law enforcement need robust self-defense rights—had agents been disarmed by progressive defund rhetoric, the outcome might’ve been far bloodier for innocents. Pretti’s knife-wielding lunacy mirrors the mostly peaceful protests that torched cities in 2020, reminding 2A advocates that the right to keep and bear arms isn’t just for hunters or sport; it’s the ultimate backstop against the very anarchy these activists provoke. Nolte nails it: their cause is amoral because it prioritizes performative rage over human life, eroding the rule of law that the Founders enshrined firearms to protect.

For the 2A community, the implications are crystal clear—double down on messaging that frames gun rights as the antidote to such chaos. As investigations wrap and narratives twist, use this as Exhibit A: disarmed societies breed vulnerability, while armed ones deter the kind of vigilante theater that claimed Good and Pretti. Share the clips, call out the spin, and vote accordingly; the right to self-preservation isn’t negotiable, no matter how many blue-haired revolutionaries romanticize their own demise.

Share this story