President Terry Schilling of the American Principles Project just dropped a bombshell prediction: the Supreme Court is poised to deliver a crushing victory against the ACLU’s total garbage argument in two pivotal cases on state laws banning males—including those identifying as transgender—from dominating women’s sports teams. After oral arguments this week, Schilling’s confidence stems from the justices’ sharp grilling of ACLU lawyers, who couldn’t substantiate claims that these commonsense protections violate Title IX or equal protection. It’s a rare moment of judicial sanity piercing the progressive fog, affirming that biological reality trumps ideological fantasy on the field.

Digging deeper, this isn’t just about sports—it’s a cultural bellwether for how courts handle reality-denying activism, much like the endless assaults on Second Amendment rights. Just as gun-grabbers peddle common-sense myths about assault weapons or ghost guns to erode the right to keep and bear arms, trans activists push pseudoscience to upend women’s athletics, ignoring overwhelming evidence from biology and fair play. SCOTUS’s apparent skepticism here signals a potential backlash against lawfare tactics that mirror ATF overreaches or Biden-era edicts trying to redefine firearm out of existence. For 2A warriors, it’s a morale boost: when courts start calling out garbage arguments, it weakens the left’s entire playbook, from campus carry bans to red-flag laws disguised as safety measures.

The implications ripple wide—if Schilling’s right and these bans hold, it fortifies state sovereignty against federal overreach, echoing recent 2A wins like Bruen that demand historical fidelity over activist inventions. Women’s sports get preserved, biological fairness prevails, and the precedent chills similar nonsense in gun rights battles. We’re not just watching a win for girls’ teams; it’s a template for dismantling the regulatory state one garbage argument at a time. Stay locked and loaded—this could be the momentum we need.