Hate ads?! Want to be able to search and filter? Day and Night mode? Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Denver Mayor: ICE Should ‘Restrict’ Focus to Violent Criminals, Only Those Are Public Safety Threats

Listen to Article

Denver Mayor Mike Johnston’s recent CNN appearance has sparked a firestorm of debate, where he boldly declared that ICE should restrict their focus solely to illegal immigrants who’ve committed violent crimes, dismissing broader enforcement as unnecessary for public safety. Speaking on CNN News Central, Johnston argued that ICE’s role is limited to partnering with local cops on those folks who are here illegally who have committed violent crimes, implying that non-violent undocumented individuals pose zero threat. It’s a classic sanctuary city playbook move from the Mile High mayor, who’s already overseen Denver’s transformation into a de facto no-go zone for federal immigration enforcement—yet somehow, he sleeps soundly while residents foot the bill for strained resources.

This isn’t just immigration policy theater; it’s a direct gut-punch to the Second Amendment community, exposing the hypocrisy at the heart of public safety rhetoric from the left. If only violent criminals warrant ICE attention, why stop there? Apply the same logic to guns: why enforce laws against mere possession when the real threats are mass shooters? We’ve seen this movie before—progressive DAs like George Gascón in LA or Kim Foxx in Chicago who restrict focus to violent offenders, releasing repeat misdemeanor offenders who graduate to felonies, all while demonizing law-abiding gun owners as the true danger. In Denver, where violent crime has surged amid migrant influxes (homicide up 50% in recent years per local stats), Johnston’s stance ignores how lax enforcement emboldens criminals of all stripes, including those who illegally carry firearms. Data from the DOJ shows illegal immigrants are disproportionately involved in gun crimes in sanctuary jurisdictions, yet mayors like Johnston pretend otherwise to virtue-signal.

The 2A implications are crystal clear: when elites redefine threats to suit their open-borders agenda, armed self-defense becomes the last line for citizens left defenseless. Gun owners in places like Denver are already navigating a patchwork of state red-flag laws and mag bans under Johnston’s Colorado, where public safety means disarming the law-abiding while shielding violent actors. This is why 2A advocacy must hammer home the indivisibility of rights—border security isn’t separate from self-defense; unsecured borders flood communities with unvetted threats, making every concealed carrier a frontline sentinel. Support groups like GOA or FPC pushing back on sanctuary insanity, because if ICE gets neutered, your local range day could be the next policy casualty. Stay vigilant, patriots.

Share this story