Dem Sen. Murphy: ‘Likely’ We’ll Vote ‘To Open Up ICE’ if They Do What We Want on Masks, Patrols, Investigations

March 18, 2026
9:40 pm

▶

Listen to Article

Imagine a world where federal immigration enforcement gets dangled like a carrot on a stick, contingent on surrendering core constitutional protections. That's the bombshell from Democrat Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut, who let slip on PBS NewsHour that Democrats are likely to vote to open up ICE – meaning ramp up detentions, deportations, and border security – but only if Republicans cave on kneecapping ICE's ability to conduct investigations, patrols, and even basic identification of illegal aliens. Murphy's quid pro quo is as blatant as it gets: trade away your sovereignty and public safety for political points on what he frames as reforms, but let's call it what it is – a deliberate sabotage of enforcement unless the other side bends the knee. This isn't just Beltway horse-trading; it's a masterclass in Democrat priorities that should send chills down the spine of every 2A patriot. Think about it: ICE agents, already stretched thin, rely on patrols and investigations to root out criminal networks, including those funneling guns to cartels and gangs terrorizing American streets. Murphy's scheme would hobble those exact operations, potentially flooding communities with unvetted individuals who bypass background checks and fuel the black market firearms trade that anti-gunners love to blame on law-abiding citizens. We've seen this playbook before – remember how sanctuary policies turned cities into no-go zones, spiking violent crime and illegal gun trafficking? By conditioning ICE expansion on these restrictions, Democrats are admitting they view immigration enforcement as a bargaining chip, not a duty, all while ignoring how porous borders directly undermine Second Amendment security. It's a Trojan horse for defanging federal law enforcement, paving the way for more common-sense restrictions that inevitably circle back to disarming the rest of us. For the 2A community, the implications are crystal clear: this is existential. Weakened ICE means more unchecked criminals with access to firearms, bolstering the left's narrative that gun violence stems from legal owners rather than the real culprits crossing our southern flank. It's time to connect the dots – support for robust ICE isn't optional; it's a frontline defense of the right to self-defense. Rally your networks, hit the phones to Congress, and remind Republicans that folding here hands ammo (pun intended) to every gun-grabber in D.C. Stay vigilant; our rights hang by a thread thinner than Murphy's feigned bipartisanship.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

Imagine a world where federal immigration enforcement gets dangled like a carrot on a stick, contingent on surrendering core constitutional protections. That’s the bombshell from Democrat Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut, who let slip on PBS NewsHour that Democrats are likely to vote to open up ICE – meaning ramp up detentions, deportations, and border security – but only if Republicans cave on kneecapping ICE’s ability to conduct investigations, patrols, and even basic identification of illegal aliens. Murphy’s quid pro quo is as blatant as it gets: trade away your sovereignty and public safety for political points on what he frames as reforms, but let’s call it what it is – a deliberate sabotage of enforcement unless the other side bends the knee.

This isn’t just Beltway horse-trading; it’s a masterclass in Democrat priorities that should send chills down the spine of every 2A patriot. Think about it: ICE agents, already stretched thin, rely on patrols and investigations to root out criminal networks, including those funneling guns to cartels and gangs terrorizing American streets. Murphy’s scheme would hobble those exact operations, potentially flooding communities with unvetted individuals who bypass background checks and fuel the black market firearms trade that anti-gunners love to blame on law-abiding citizens. We’ve seen this playbook before – remember how sanctuary policies turned cities into no-go zones, spiking violent crime and illegal gun trafficking? By conditioning ICE expansion on these restrictions, Democrats are admitting they view immigration enforcement as a bargaining chip, not a duty, all while ignoring how porous borders directly undermine Second Amendment security. It’s a Trojan horse for defanging federal law enforcement, paving the way for more common-sense restrictions that inevitably circle back to disarming the rest of us.

For the 2A community, the implications are crystal clear: this is existential. Weakened ICE means more unchecked criminals with access to firearms, bolstering the left’s narrative that gun violence stems from legal owners rather than the real culprits crossing our southern flank. It’s time to connect the dots – support for robust ICE isn’t optional; it’s a frontline defense of the right to self-defense. Rally your networks, hit the phones to Congress, and remind Republicans that folding here hands ammo (pun intended) to every gun-grabber in D.C. Stay vigilant; our rights hang by a thread thinner than Murphy’s feigned bipartisanship.

Share this story