Dem Rep. Moulton: ‘It’s Clear to Me that ICE Needs to Be Abolished’

February 23, 2026
11:52 am

▶

Listen to Article

Democrat Rep. Seth Moulton just dropped a bombshell on CNN's New Central, declaring that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) needs to be straight-up abolished. This isn't some fringe tweet from a squad member—it's a sitting congressman from Massachusetts, a deep-blue stronghold, openly calling for the dismantling of a key federal agency tasked with border security and enforcing immigration laws. Moulton's rationale? He claims ICE has morphed into something unrecognizable, bloated with mission creep that distracts from real threats. But let's peel back the layers: this comes amid record migrant encounters at the southern border, with over 2.4 million in FY2023 alone, many released into the interior due to catch-and-release policies. Abolishing ICE wouldn't magically fix that; it'd likely turbocharge chaos, handing cartels and smugglers a free-for-all while taxpayers foot the bill for endless welfare and sanctuary city handouts. For the 2A community, Moulton's ICE abolition fantasy is a flashing red warning light. ICE isn't just about deportations—it's the muscle behind Operation Stonegarden, partnering with local sheriffs and state police to secure borders and combat transnational crime, including gun trafficking by cartels flooding American streets with military-grade hardware smuggled past porous frontiers. We've seen it firsthand: 90% of firearms seized by Mexican authorities trace back to U.S. sources, per ATF data, but that's a fraction of the story when unchecked migration funnels unvetted individuals—some with gang ties—into our neighborhoods. Scrap ICE, and you're gutting federal-local collaborations that help trace and interdict these illegal arms flows, leaving red-state patriots to pick up the slack with their own resources. It's no coincidence that blue-state Dems pushing this agenda often overlap with gun-grabbers; weakening border enforcement indirectly bolsters their narrative that more guns = more crime, ignoring how open borders import the violence. The implications ripple far beyond immigration wonks—Moulton's call is a trial balloon for the radical left's 2024 playbook, testing waters ahead of midterms where border security could flip swing districts. 2A advocates should sound the alarm: a nation without ICE is a nation without sovereignty, where Second Amendment sanctuaries face existential threats from imported gangs armed to the teeth. Contact your reps, amplify this insanity on socials, and remember—strong borders protect our rights as much as strong cartridges. If Moulton gets his way, the real abolition might be of law-abiding Americans' ability to defend hearth and home. Stay vigilant, patriots.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

Democrat Rep. Seth Moulton just dropped a bombshell on CNN’s New Central, declaring that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) needs to be straight-up abolished. This isn’t some fringe tweet from a squad member—it’s a sitting congressman from Massachusetts, a deep-blue stronghold, openly calling for the dismantling of a key federal agency tasked with border security and enforcing immigration laws. Moulton’s rationale? He claims ICE has morphed into something unrecognizable, bloated with mission creep that distracts from real threats. But let’s peel back the layers: this comes amid record migrant encounters at the southern border, with over 2.4 million in FY2023 alone, many released into the interior due to catch-and-release policies. Abolishing ICE wouldn’t magically fix that; it’d likely turbocharge chaos, handing cartels and smugglers a free-for-all while taxpayers foot the bill for endless welfare and sanctuary city handouts.

For the 2A community, Moulton’s ICE abolition fantasy is a flashing red warning light. ICE isn’t just about deportations—it’s the muscle behind Operation Stonegarden, partnering with local sheriffs and state police to secure borders and combat transnational crime, including gun trafficking by cartels flooding American streets with military-grade hardware smuggled past porous frontiers. We’ve seen it firsthand: 90% of firearms seized by Mexican authorities trace back to U.S. sources, per ATF data, but that’s a fraction of the story when unchecked migration funnels unvetted individuals—some with gang ties—into our neighborhoods. Scrap ICE, and you’re gutting federal-local collaborations that help trace and interdict these illegal arms flows, leaving red-state patriots to pick up the slack with their own resources. It’s no coincidence that blue-state Dems pushing this agenda often overlap with gun-grabbers; weakening border enforcement indirectly bolsters their narrative that more guns = more crime, ignoring how open borders import the violence.

The implications ripple far beyond immigration wonks—Moulton’s call is a trial balloon for the radical left’s 2024 playbook, testing waters ahead of midterms where border security could flip swing districts. 2A advocates should sound the alarm: a nation without ICE is a nation without sovereignty, where Second Amendment sanctuaries face existential threats from imported gangs armed to the teeth. Contact your reps, amplify this insanity on socials, and remember—strong borders protect our rights as much as strong cartridges. If Moulton gets his way, the real abolition might be of law-abiding Americans’ ability to defend hearth and home. Stay vigilant, patriots.

Share this story