Arizona Sheriffs’ Association Blasts AZ AG’s ‘Rhetoric’ About Shooting ICE

January 27, 2026
10:41 am

▶

Listen to Article

In a fiery rebuke that's got the Second Amendment community buzzing, the Arizona Sheriffs’ Association has unleashed on Attorney General Kris Mayes for her inflammatory rhetoric surrounding the recent shooting of ICE agents. Mayes' comments, which critics say irresponsibly stoked fears and painted law enforcement in a negative light, have ignited a statewide firestorm—and the sheriffs aren't mincing words. They're calling her out for undermining the very officers who put their lives on the line daily, especially amid a surge in border-related violence where armed confrontations are the grim reality. This isn't just bureaucratic infighting; it's a stark reminder of how politicized narratives can erode trust in the badge, potentially emboldening criminals who see division as weakness. Digging deeper, this clash exposes the hypocrisy in anti-2A rhetoric that demonizes self-defense tools while ignoring the context of escalating threats at the border. ICE agents, often outgunned and outnumbered, rely on their Second Amendment rights just like any American facing imminent danger—yet Mayes' statements risk framing their armed response as the problem, not the attackers. For the 2A community, the sheriffs' stand is a bullseye hit: it reinforces that law enforcement leaders, who live the realities of gun violence, are pushing back against soft-on-crime prosecutors who prioritize optics over officer safety. Historical parallels abound—think sanctuary policies that hamstring ICE, leading to preventable tragedies like the ambush in Arizona. The implications? This could galvanize 2A advocates to rally behind pro-law enforcement candidates in upcoming elections, turning Arizona into a battleground for defending armed protectors. If Mayes' rhetoric prevails, expect more emboldened assaults on federal agents, further straining resources and justifying calls for expanded concealed carry reciprocity and training mandates. Sheriffs are drawing a line in the sand: rhetoric kills slower than bullets, but it kills just the same. 2A supporters, take note—this is your cue to amplify these voices before the next headline bleeds red.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

In a fiery rebuke that’s got the Second Amendment community buzzing, the Arizona Sheriffs’ Association has unleashed on Attorney General Kris Mayes for her inflammatory rhetoric surrounding the recent shooting of ICE agents. Mayes’ comments, which critics say irresponsibly stoked fears and painted law enforcement in a negative light, have ignited a statewide firestorm—and the sheriffs aren’t mincing words. They’re calling her out for undermining the very officers who put their lives on the line daily, especially amid a surge in border-related violence where armed confrontations are the grim reality. This isn’t just bureaucratic infighting; it’s a stark reminder of how politicized narratives can erode trust in the badge, potentially emboldening criminals who see division as weakness.

Digging deeper, this clash exposes the hypocrisy in anti-2A rhetoric that demonizes self-defense tools while ignoring the context of escalating threats at the border. ICE agents, often outgunned and outnumbered, rely on their Second Amendment rights just like any American facing imminent danger—yet Mayes’ statements risk framing their armed response as the problem, not the attackers. For the 2A community, the sheriffs’ stand is a bullseye hit: it reinforces that law enforcement leaders, who live the realities of gun violence, are pushing back against soft-on-crime prosecutors who prioritize optics over officer safety. Historical parallels abound—think sanctuary policies that hamstring ICE, leading to preventable tragedies like the ambush in Arizona.

The implications? This could galvanize 2A advocates to rally behind pro-law enforcement candidates in upcoming elections, turning Arizona into a battleground for defending armed protectors. If Mayes’ rhetoric prevails, expect more emboldened assaults on federal agents, further straining resources and justifying calls for expanded concealed carry reciprocity and training mandates. Sheriffs are drawing a line in the sand: rhetoric kills slower than bullets, but it kills just the same. 2A supporters, take note—this is your cue to amplify these voices before the next headline bleeds red.

Share this story