Alleged Antifa Ringleader to Testify as Nine Defendants Face Trial in ICE Facility Terrorism Attack

February 17, 2026
11:46 am

▶

Listen to Article

Benjamin Hanil Song, the alleged Antifa mastermind behind the July 4, 2025, armed assault on the Prairieland ICE Detention Center in Texas, is set to testify Tuesday as nine co-defendants face federal trial in Fort Worth. Charges run the gamut from attempted murder of federal officers to providing material support to terrorists, painting a picture of a coordinated paramilitary operation that turned fireworks night into a battlefield. Song, accused of organizing the attack, reportedly flipped to cooperate with prosecutors, potentially spilling details on Antifa's network, funding, and tactics—details that could expose how left-wing extremists weaponize ideology into violence. This isn't just another riot; it's a stark reminder of the asymmetric warfare brewing on America's streets, where Antifa militants—often masked, armed with rifles, improvised explosives, and Molotovs—target symbols of federal authority like ICE facilities. Contextually, this echoes the 2020 Portland courthouse sieges and Atlanta's Cop City clashes, but escalates with direct assaults on officers, blurring lines between protest and terrorism. For the 2A community, the implications are profound: while these attackers exploited firearms (likely obtained through straw purchases or black markets, evading universal background checks), their actions fuel the very gun-grab narratives anti-2A politicians crave. Yet, it underscores why armed self-defense is non-negotiable—law-abiding citizens and officers relied on their Second Amendment rights to repel the assault, saving lives amid chaos. The silver lining? Song's testimony could dismantle Antifa cells, validating calls for designating them a domestic terror group and tightening scrutiny on their arms pipelines. 2A advocates should seize this: highlight how responsible gun ownership thwarted the attack, push for prosecuting these incidents as terrorism without exception, and remind the public that the real threat isn't legal firearms in good hands—it's radicals who treat them as tools for anarchy. Watch the trial closely; it might just be the precedent that fortifies our defenses against the next holiday celebration gone rogue.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

This isn’t just another riot; it’s a stark reminder of the asymmetric warfare brewing on America’s streets, where Antifa militants—often masked, armed with rifles, improvised explosives, and Molotovs—target symbols of federal authority like ICE facilities. Contextually, this echoes the 2020 Portland courthouse sieges and Atlanta’s Cop City clashes, but escalates with direct assaults on officers, blurring lines between protest and terrorism. For the 2A community, the implications are profound: while these attackers exploited firearms (likely obtained through straw purchases or black markets, evading universal background checks), their actions fuel the very gun-grab narratives anti-2A politicians crave. Yet, it underscores why armed self-defense is non-negotiable—law-abiding citizens and officers relied on their Second Amendment rights to repel the assault, saving lives amid chaos.

The silver lining? Song’s testimony could dismantle Antifa cells, validating calls for designating them a domestic terror group and tightening scrutiny on their arms pipelines. 2A advocates should seize this: highlight how responsible gun ownership thwarted the attack, push for prosecuting these incidents as terrorism without exception, and remind the public that the real threat isn’t legal firearms in good hands—it’s radicals who treat them as tools for anarchy. Watch the trial closely; it might just be the precedent that fortifies our defenses against the next holiday celebration gone rogue.

Share this story