Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

pew report black

Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Rifle Range in Glendive to Close Temporarily for Survey Work

Listen to Article

The temporary closure of the Glendive Rifle Range is more than a scheduling inconvenience—it’s a signal that Montana’s public lands managers are finally treating long-range shooting as a legitimate, growing recreational demand rather than an afterthought. By carving out time for cultural and heritage surveys, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks is doing the homework required to expand the facility’s footprint, a move that could add dedicated 600- and 1,000-yard bays without stepping on sacred ground or running afoul of preservation statutes. For shooters, that translates into fewer excuses from bureaucrats who have historically cited “environmental concerns” to stall range improvements; here, the state is proactively clearing those hurdles before the first shovel hits the dirt.

What makes this development especially noteworthy for the 2A community is the precedent it sets. When agencies invest real resources in survey work, they’re implicitly acknowledging that firearms training and marksmanship are compatible with multiple-use mandates on public land. That recognition matters in an era when anti-gun litigation often tries to portray any expansion of shooting opportunities as an inherent conflict with conservation values. If Glendive’s upgrades succeed, expect copy-cat proposals in neighboring states where similar terrain and population densities exist; conversely, if the surveys drag on or yield restrictive findings, the episode will become fresh ammunition for those arguing that federal and state agencies cannot be trusted to manage ranges fairly.

In practical terms, the three-day window is a small price for shooters who already plan around harvest seasons and weather. The real test will come when the survey data is released and the public gets its first look at proposed lane layouts and potential restrictions. Until then, the takeaway is clear: organized, persistent engagement with land-management agencies can convert “temporary closure” notices into permanent capacity gains—an outcome worth monitoring, replicating, and, when warranted, celebrating.

Share this story