Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

pew report black

Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Protect Nesting Loons and Loon Chicks

Listen to Article

Vermont’s call to give nesting loons a wide berth isn’t just about bird-watching etiquette; it’s a textbook case of how incremental “wildlife protection” rules can quietly shrink the places where lawful outdoor recreation—including lawful carry—remains practical. When state biologists urge boaters to stay hundreds of feet from every shoreline nest, they are also defining new buffer zones that future enforcement officers may treat as de-facto no-go areas for anyone with a holstered sidearm or a long gun cased for the range. The same logic that turns a loon chick into a moving violation can later be repurposed to argue that a firearm is an unacceptable “disturbance” in the same sensitive habitat, especially once anti-hunting groups latch onto the precedent.

Equally telling is the focus on lead tackle. While the piece frames sinkers and jigs as toxic litter, the 2A community recognizes the familiar pattern: a narrow environmental concern is leveraged into broad ammunition restrictions. Vermont already limits lead shot for waterfowl; extending that logic to fishing weights is only one regulatory hop from questioning center-fire rifle ammunition on public land. Responsible sportsmen already police their own refuse—collection tubes at boat ramps prove the point—so the heavier-handed approach looks less like conservation and more like another lever for limiting the tools citizens can lawfully bring into the woods.

The deeper implication is cultural. Stories like this normalize the idea that human presence itself, especially when armed, is the problem to be managed. Once that premise takes hold, buffer zones, seasonal closures, and “wildlife disturbance” citations become the thin end of a wedge that can eventually reach backcountry carry, night hunting, or even the simple act of keeping a defensive firearm in a vehicle parked at a trailhead. The Vermont Center for Ecostudies may be counting loons, but the 2A community should be counting new restrictions—because every loon saved today can become the rationale for another inch of lost freedom tomorrow.

Share this story