After Suing Denver Over AWB, DOJ Sues State of Colorado Over ‘High Cap’ Magazine Ban

May 7, 2026
6:20 am

▶

Listen to Article

In a seismic shift that's got the gun rights world buzzing, the U.S. Department of Justice has escalated its Second Amendment crusade by suing the State of Colorado over its high-capacity magazine ban, hot on the heels of a lawsuit against Denver's assault weapons ban. This isn't just another courtroom skirmish—it's the feds stepping up as the unlikely champion for everyday Americans tired of patchwork state-level gun grabs. Quoting the source that broke the news: “This is the first time in American history that the United States Department of Justice is on the side of the citizens in enforcing the Second Amendment.” Picture that: the DOJ, long a bogeyman for 2A advocates, now wielding the full weight of federal power to dismantle magazine restrictions that Colorado voters narrowly approved in 2016 amid post-Sandy Hook hysteria. Digging deeper, this move builds on a string of Supreme Court victories like Bruen (2022), which demanded gun laws align with historical traditions—a standard Colorado's 15+ round mag limit spectacularly fails. Standard magazines holding 20-30 rounds have been the norm since the AR-15's inception in the 1960s, predating any assault weapon panic. Colorado's ban, like those in eight other states, forces law-abiding citizens to choose between suboptimal 10-round tubes or illegal upgrades, all while criminals ignore the rules. The DOJ's entry signals a federal intolerance for these zombie laws, especially after lower courts have started striking them down post-Bruen. It's clever lawfare: by targeting a deep-blue state like Colorado, the feds expose the hypocrisy of common-sense reforms that crumble under scrutiny. For the 2A community, the implications are electric. This could trigger a domino effect, pressuring holdout states like California and New York to rethink their mag bans before facing Uncle Sam's lawyers. It bolsters the narrative that the right to keep and bear arms isn't a state-granted privilege but a constitutional bedrock, potentially paving the way for nationwide relief. Gun owners nationwide should cheer this rare DOJ pivot—it's a reminder that elections have consequences, and with a pro-2A administration, the tide is turning from defense to offense. Stay locked and loaded; the battle for standard-capacity freedom is just heating up.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

In a seismic shift that’s got the gun rights world buzzing, the U.S. Department of Justice has escalated its Second Amendment crusade by suing the State of Colorado over its high-capacity magazine ban, hot on the heels of a lawsuit against Denver’s assault weapons ban. This isn’t just another courtroom skirmish—it’s the feds stepping up as the unlikely champion for everyday Americans tired of patchwork state-level gun grabs. Quoting the source that broke the news: “This is the first time in American history that the United States Department of Justice is on the side of the citizens in enforcing the Second Amendment.” Picture that: the DOJ, long a bogeyman for 2A advocates, now wielding the full weight of federal power to dismantle magazine restrictions that Colorado voters narrowly approved in 2016 amid post-Sandy Hook hysteria.

Digging deeper, this move builds on a string of Supreme Court victories like Bruen (2022), which demanded gun laws align with historical traditions—a standard Colorado’s 15+ round mag limit spectacularly fails. Standard magazines holding 20-30 rounds have been the norm since the AR-15’s inception in the 1960s, predating any assault weapon panic. Colorado’s ban, like those in eight other states, forces law-abiding citizens to choose between suboptimal 10-round tubes or illegal upgrades, all while criminals ignore the rules. The DOJ’s entry signals a federal intolerance for these zombie laws, especially after lower courts have started striking them down post-Bruen. It’s clever lawfare: by targeting a deep-blue state like Colorado, the feds expose the hypocrisy of common-sense reforms that crumble under scrutiny.

For the 2A community, the implications are electric. This could trigger a domino effect, pressuring holdout states like California and New York to rethink their mag bans before facing Uncle Sam’s lawyers. It bolsters the narrative that the right to keep and bear arms isn’t a state-granted privilege but a constitutional bedrock, potentially paving the way for nationwide relief. Gun owners nationwide should cheer this rare DOJ pivot—it’s a reminder that elections have consequences, and with a pro-2A administration, the tide is turning from defense to offense. Stay locked and loaded; the battle for standard-capacity freedom is just heating up.

Share this story