AG Blanch Rejects Gun Control Push

Host Paul Glasco of Legally Armed America praises new Attorney General Blanch for pushing back against media calls for stricter gun laws following the thwarted attack at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. Glasco highlights Blanch’s CBS interview, where he emphasized that the incident was about law enforcement success, not new restrictions. ‘This is about law enforcement who are doing their jobs and a suspect who tried to do something and failed miserably,’ Blanch stated, resisting questions on train travel firearm protocols.

Glasco notes the attacker legally purchased firearms in California and traveled by train to D.C., underscoring no illegal possession issues. He criticizes the predictable push for ‘new laws’ after crimes, regardless of legality.

Attacker’s Weapon and Racist Motives Exposed

The attacker wielded a Maverick 88 shotgun—a budget Mossberg model with pistol grip and sling—sprinting through the hotel lobby. Glasco shares a personal anecdote: ‘Funny side story, I used to hunt with one of those in South Louisiana back in the day cuz I bought it at a pawn shop for like $90.’ He details its utilitarian durability for harsh conditions like duck hunting in brackish water.

• Pros: Affordable (under $100 used), rugged for dirty environments, smooth functionality similar to premium Mossberg.
• Cons: Pistol grip deemed ‘way more evil’ in media optics; basic model lacks premium features.
• Specs: Maverick 88 by Mossberg, pistol grip, sling-equipped; cheap hardware with reliable engagement.

Double Standard on Racism and Security Lapses

Glasco slams the attacker—a no-party voter who donated $25 to ActBlue—as a ‘raging racist leftist lunatic’ for targeting ‘administration officials, not including Mr. Patel’ due to his ethnicity. He contrasts this with hypothetical outrage if reversed: ‘I get your attention. That didn’t happen. Actually, the opposite of that happened… Would that be considered racist? Uh-huh.’ Glasco calls out media hypocrisy and urges truth-telling: ‘You come here for truth, I’m going to give you truth. I don’t give a [__] what anybody thinks.’

He also critiques Trump administration security, noting all key successors (Trump, Vance, Johnson) were present, leaving Senate President pro tempore Chuck Grassley next in line: ‘That alone should have been enough… to leave somebody out of that place in safety somewhere else.’