Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

pew report black

Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

BREAKING: Federal Court Says NFA is Unconstitutional

Listen to Article

The Northern District of Texas just handed the gun-rights community its most significant legal victory since *Bruen*, and the ripples are already spreading far beyond silencers. Judge Reed O’Connor’s final judgment in the GOA/Silencer Shop Foundation case doesn’t merely carve out an exception for suppressors; it guts the entire National Firearms Act’s registration-and-tax regime by declaring that the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms “in common use” without a federal permission slip. That single sentence effectively places the NFA’s $200 tax stamp, its multi-month wait, and its registration database on the same constitutional footing as poll taxes and literacy tests—relics that cannot survive strict scrutiny.

What makes this ruling especially potent is the court’s willingness to treat the NFA as a historical anomaly rather than a settled feature of American law. By anchoring its analysis in the text, history, and tradition test demanded by *Bruen*, Judge O’Connor rejected the government’s fallback argument that “dangerous and unusual” weapons can be presumptively banned. Suppressors, the court noted, are neither; they are safety devices that reduce noise pollution and hearing loss, owned by hundreds of thousands of law-abiding citizens. Once that factual premise is accepted, the NFA’s entire architecture—designed in 1934 to price ordinary citizens out of entire categories of arms—collapses under its own weight.

For the broader 2A community the implications are immediate and strategic. Litigants in other NFA challenges now have a published district-court opinion holding that the federal government cannot force citizens to pay a tax or submit to registration simply to exercise a fundamental right. Expect a wave of new suits targeting short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and even the Hughes Amendment’s machine-gun ban. More importantly, the ruling supplies fresh ammunition for state attorneys general who have been itching to nullify federal gun-control measures; if the NFA is unconstitutional, states that have already refused to enforce it now have judicial cover. The Biden administration will almost certainly appeal, but the opinion’s thorough historical analysis and narrow tailoring make reversal anything but certain. In short, the courthouse door that gun owners have been knocking on for ninety years just swung open.

Share this story