Larry Sanger’s indefinite ban from the platform he co-founded isn’t just another Wikipedia drama—it’s a flashing neon sign that the same ideological monoculture now policing “reliable sources” on firearms is also rewriting the rules of who gets to speak at all. Sanger’s modest proposal for an internal working group on intellectual diversity was treated like an existential threat, complete with procedural theater that veteran editors openly called a show trial. For the 2A community, the lesson is immediate: the same editors who reflexively label the NRA, GOA, or even peer-reviewed studies on defensive gun uses as “biased” or “fringe” now have formal license to disappear dissenters rather than debate them. When the world’s most-cited reference work treats viewpoint diversity itself as a policy violation, every citation war over shall-issue permitting, magazine capacity, or the historical scope of the Second Amendment becomes a rigged game whose outcome is decided before the first edit is saved.