Rosie O’Donnell ‘Horrified’ by Trump Inquiring with FIFA World Cup President About U.S. Player’s Red Card

July 9, 2026
10:03 am

▶

Listen to Article

Rosie O’Donnell’s outrage over President Trump’s call to FIFA’s Gianni Infantino to review a red card against U.S. striker Folarin Balogun is the latest reminder that the same people who recoil at any executive pushback against international bureaucracy are perfectly comfortable when that bureaucracy tramples individual rights at home. Trump’s request wasn’t about rewriting soccer rules; it was about an American leader refusing to let a foreign sporting body steamroll one of his citizens without scrutiny—an instinct that mirrors the Second Amendment community’s long-standing refusal to let the ATF, UN arms treaties, or state-level gun-grabbers unilaterally disarm law-abiding Americans. The “horrified” reaction from the left reveals a deeper discomfort: they prefer citizens remain passive subjects of global or federal edict rather than see an elected official treat them as constituents worth defending. What makes the episode especially telling for gun owners is the selective application of “interference.” When Trump questions a red card, it’s portrayed as dangerous overreach; when the same critics cheer ATF redefining pistol braces, forcing FFLs to close, or pushing magazine bans through regulatory fiat, they call it “common-sense safety.” The 2A community has watched this double standard for decades—foreign or domestic authorities get a pass when they restrict firearms, yet any pushback is labeled extremism. Trump’s willingness to pick up the phone for Balogun signals the same posture that produced pro-Second Amendment judges, withdrew from the UN Arms Trade Treaty, and blocked international efforts to track and restrict American gun owners. That posture matters more than any single soccer match because it keeps the principle alive that sovereignty and individual rights are not negotiable bargaining chips. The real implication is cultural. If even a trivial sporting dispute triggers accusations of authoritarianism, the left’s tolerance for actual authoritarian measures against gun owners will only grow once they regain power. The 2A community’s task is to treat every such episode as a warning shot: document the hypocrisy, highlight the pattern, and keep supporting leaders who view citizens—not global commissions or administrative agencies—as the ultimate authority.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

What makes the episode especially telling for gun owners is the selective application of “interference.” When Trump questions a red card, it’s portrayed as dangerous overreach; when the same critics cheer ATF redefining pistol braces, forcing FFLs to close, or pushing magazine bans through regulatory fiat, they call it “common-sense safety.” The 2A community has watched this double standard for decades—foreign or domestic authorities get a pass when they restrict firearms, yet any pushback is labeled extremism. Trump’s willingness to pick up the phone for Balogun signals the same posture that produced pro-Second Amendment judges, withdrew from the UN Arms Trade Treaty, and blocked international efforts to track and restrict American gun owners. That posture matters more than any single soccer match because it keeps the principle alive that sovereignty and individual rights are not negotiable bargaining chips.

The real implication is cultural. If even a trivial sporting dispute triggers accusations of authoritarianism, the left’s tolerance for actual authoritarian measures against gun owners will only grow once they regain power. The 2A community’s task is to treat every such episode as a warning shot: document the hypocrisy, highlight the pattern, and keep supporting leaders who view citizens—not global commissions or administrative agencies—as the ultimate authority.

Share this story