Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

pew report black

Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Appeals Court Rejects Biden Effort to Shield Ghostwriter Interview Tapes

▶
Listen to Article

The federal appeals court’s refusal to let Joe Biden keep those 2017 ghostwriter tapes under wraps is more than a routine FOIA win—it’s a reminder that the same administration that claims “common-sense gun safety” also treats transparency like a threat to national security. By fighting to hide the raw audio of a president discussing his own cognitive fitness and decision-making process, the White House has handed the 2A community yet another data point: when officials insist they need sweeping new restrictions on law-abiding citizens, they simultaneously demand the right to operate in the dark. The court’s ruling forces daylight onto the very records that could reveal how policy impulses are formed, and that matters when those impulses include targeting pistol braces, redefining “engaged in the business,” and pushing universal background checks that would create a de-facto registry.

For gun owners who have watched ATF rulemakings and White House fact sheets appear with little legislative underpinning, the ghostwriter-tape fight underscores a deeper pattern. The same legal team arguing that releasing interview recordings would “chill” future candid conversations is the team that has shown zero hesitation about chilling the exercise of an enumerated constitutional right through regulatory end-runs. If the president’s own words about his fitness and policy formation are too sensitive for public scrutiny, how credible is the claim that millions of ordinary Americans must submit to expanded scrutiny just to exercise their Second Amendment rights? The appeals court just said the public’s interest outweighs that secrecy argument, and that precedent travels.

The practical takeaway for the 2A community is straightforward: every document, recording, or internal memo pried loose is leverage in the next appropriations fight, the next lawsuit against an ATF rule, and the next election cycle. Supporters of the right to keep and bear arms should treat this ruling not as a partisan victory but as confirmation that sunlight remains the best disinfectant when government power expands in the shadows.

Share this story