Hate ads?! Want to be able to search and filter? Day and Night mode? Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Two Academics Propose Tax They Claim Will Reduce Homicides Without Infringing on Gun Owners

Listen to Article

Two academics have floated a clever firearm tax scheme they swear will slash homicides without touching the sacred rights of law-abiding gun owners. The pitch? Slap a steep tax—potentially thousands of dollars—on handguns and high-capacity magazines, while exempting long guns like rifles and shotguns, which they claim are rarely used in murders anyway. Drawing from data showing pistols dominate urban homicide stats, the professors argue this targeted levy would price out impulsive criminals and young thugs in high-crime areas, who often can’t afford premium-priced firepower, without pricing out hunters, sport shooters, or rural self-defense enthusiasts. It’s dressed up as a win-win: fewer bodies in Chicago’s streets, no confiscations or registries required.

But let’s peel back the academic veneer—this is a Trojan horse for incremental erosion of Second Amendment rights, plain and simple. Proponents gloss over how such a tax mirrors historical poll taxes that disenfranchised the poor, now repackaged to disarm the economically vulnerable who need self-defense most in crime-riddled neighborhoods. History screams warning: Australia’s 1996 buyback started with reasonable restrictions on semi-autos, ballooning into broader controls; New York’s SAFE Act taxes compliance out of existence for many. Economically, it ignores black markets—criminals don’t pay taxes, they steal or smuggle, as seen in ATF traces where 80% of crime guns come from straw purchases or theft, per 2023 data. For the 2A community, this isn’t nuance; it’s a slippery slope to funding anti-gun NGOs while subsidizing the very violence it claims to curb through violence prevention programs.

The implications? Gun owners must mobilize now. This proposal, if it gains traction in progressive policy circles, sets precedent for sin taxes on AR-15s next, then suppressors, then anything deemed scary. Rally your state reps, flood comment periods, and support orgs like GOA or FPC suing these schemes into oblivion—preemption laws in red states are our firewall. The academics’ math might check out on paper, but in reality, it’s just another intellectual fig leaf for control. Stay vigilant; our rights aren’t negotiable.

Share this story