Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

This Is Why Blaming Glock is Idiotic

Listen to Article

Blaming Glock for illegal full-auto gun conversions is not just misguided—it’s a classic case of shooting the messenger while the real criminals laugh all the way to their next felony. Glock pistols, like many popular handguns, have been the target of aftermarket “switches” or “Glock switches” that convert them into illegal machine guns. These tiny, often 3D-printed or cheaply milled parts are flooding the black market, especially in cities plagued by gang violence. Yet instead of holding shooters accountable or going after the actual manufacturers and distributors of these conversion devices, some politicians and media outlets find it easier to demonize the most popular handgun platform in America. This deflection ignores the obvious: a tool is only as dangerous as the hands that misuse it, and Glock never designed, endorsed, or sold these illegal modifications.

The reality is that criminals have been modifying firearms since the invention of gunpowder. From sawed-off shotguns to AR-15 bump stocks and now Glock switches, bad actors will always seek ways to increase firepower. What makes the current anti-Glock hysteria particularly idiotic is the selective outrage. Criminals aren’t buying these switches from Glock stores or authorized dealers—they’re sourced from underground networks, often imported or produced in makeshift machine shops. Law enforcement agencies have recovered these devices in cities like Chicago, New York, and Philadelphia, where legal gun ownership is already heavily restricted. If anything, this trend proves that restrictive gun control creates black markets where only outlaws have access to upgraded weaponry. The 2A community has long understood this truth: when you disarm the law-abiding, you simply guarantee that the lawless will always possess superior tools.

For gun owners, this manufactured controversy carries clear implications. Every time a high-profile shooting involves a modified Glock, expect another wave of calls for “assault weapon” bans, microstamping, or even suing firearm manufacturers into oblivion. It’s lawfare by another name. The Second Amendment isn’t a suggestion, and it certainly doesn’t come with an asterisk that says “only if criminals behave.” Responsible gun owners should continue training, stay vocal about personal accountability, and push back against the narrative that blames inanimate objects—or the companies that make them—for the choices of violent felons. The real culprits aren’t sitting in Smyrna, Georgia. They’re in the streets committing the crimes, and in the halls of power pretending that punishing Glock will somehow stop them.

Share this story