This Is the Most Ridiculous Proposal to Prevent ‘Gun Deaths’ We’ve Seen In a While

May 4, 2026
6:35 am

▶

Listen to Article

Imagine a world where the solution to gun deaths isn't about targeting criminals or mental health failures, but swapping out your trusty sidearm for a shoulder-fired long gun. That's the absurd pitch from a recent proposal that's got the gun community chuckling—and the anti-2A crowd nodding along like it's genius. The idea, floated in policy circles, argues that handguns are disproportionately involved in urban shootings and suicides, so why not incentivize rifles and shotguns instead? Proponents claim long guns are safer for self-defense because they're bulkier, harder to conceal, and less likely to be misused in panic situations. Sounds reasonable on paper—until you peel back the layers and see it's just another Trojan horse for gun control dressed in data cherry-picking. Let's break it down with some cold, hard facts. FBI crime stats show handguns dominate in crimes because they're portable and concealable—duh, that's why law-abiding citizens carry them for everyday protection. Long guns? Great for home defense or hunting, but try quick-drawing a 40-inch AR-15 from under your jacket in a parking lot mugging. This proposal ignores Supreme Court precedents like Heller and Bruen, which affirm the right to bear arms suitable for self-defense, including handguns as the quintessential choice. It's a sneaky pivot: instead of outright bans, nudge manufacturers and buyers toward approved firearms via taxes or regs, effectively pricing handguns out of reach. We've seen this playbook before—think Australia's long-gun favoritism post-buyback, where compliance cratered and criminals kept their pistols anyway. For the 2A community, this is a wake-up call to mock the nonsense while sharpening our arguments. Highlight how such policies disarm the vulnerable—women, the elderly, urban dwellers—who rely on compact carry guns. Rally with data: CDC stats reveal defensive gun uses dwarf criminal ones annually (2.5 million vs. 20k gun deaths), mostly with handguns. Share memes, flood comments sections, and push back at the state level where these ideas fester. Ridiculous? Sure. But ignoring it lets the Overton window slide toward mandatory mini-14s for grandma. Stay vigilant, stay armed, and keep laughing at the clowns proposing this.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

Imagine a world where the solution to gun deaths isn’t about targeting criminals or mental health failures, but swapping out your trusty sidearm for a shoulder-fired long gun. That’s the absurd pitch from a recent proposal that’s got the gun community chuckling—and the anti-2A crowd nodding along like it’s genius. The idea, floated in policy circles, argues that handguns are disproportionately involved in urban shootings and suicides, so why not incentivize rifles and shotguns instead? Proponents claim long guns are safer for self-defense because they’re bulkier, harder to conceal, and less likely to be misused in panic situations. Sounds reasonable on paper—until you peel back the layers and see it’s just another Trojan horse for gun control dressed in data cherry-picking.

Let’s break it down with some cold, hard facts. FBI crime stats show handguns dominate in crimes because they’re portable and concealable—duh, that’s why law-abiding citizens carry them for everyday protection. Long guns? Great for home defense or hunting, but try quick-drawing a 40-inch AR-15 from under your jacket in a parking lot mugging. This proposal ignores Supreme Court precedents like Heller and Bruen, which affirm the right to bear arms suitable for self-defense, including handguns as the quintessential choice. It’s a sneaky pivot: instead of outright bans, nudge manufacturers and buyers toward approved firearms via taxes or regs, effectively pricing handguns out of reach. We’ve seen this playbook before—think Australia’s long-gun favoritism post-buyback, where compliance cratered and criminals kept their pistols anyway.

For the 2A community, this is a wake-up call to mock the nonsense while sharpening our arguments. Highlight how such policies disarm the vulnerable—women, the elderly, urban dwellers—who rely on compact carry guns. Rally with data: CDC stats reveal defensive gun uses dwarf criminal ones annually (2.5 million vs. 20k gun deaths), mostly with handguns. Share memes, flood comments sections, and push back at the state level where these ideas fester. Ridiculous? Sure. But ignoring it lets the Overton window slide toward mandatory mini-14s for grandma. Stay vigilant, stay armed, and keep laughing at the clowns proposing this.

Share this story