The Left’s Attacks on Brandon Herrera Are Getting Dumber

August 23, 2026
9:12 am

▶

Listen to Article

The Left’s latest attempt to smear Brandon Herrera isn’t just sloppy—it’s a masterclass in how far the anti-gun crowd will stretch to avoid debating the actual issues. Instead of engaging with Herrera’s razor-sharp arguments on the Second Amendment, his critics have resorted to cherry-picked clips, out-of-context quotes, and the usual guilt-by-association tactics that have become their go-to playbook. What they fail to grasp is that Herrera’s appeal isn’t built on soundbites; it’s built on a consistent, unapologetic defense of the right to keep and bear arms, backed by real-world experience and a willingness to call out both parties when they drift from constitutional principles. This pattern of attack reveals a deeper insecurity within the gun-control movement. Rather than counter Herrera’s points about the shall-issue nature of constitutional carry or the practical failures of red-flag laws, his detractors are banking on character assassination to do the heavy lifting. It’s a tacit admission that their policy arguments are losing ground, especially as more Americans witness the real-world consequences of restrictive gun laws in cities like Chicago and New York. By focusing on manufactured outrage instead of substantive debate, they’re signaling to their base that the facts aren’t enough—that the cultural shift toward recognizing the Second Amendment as a fundamental right must be stopped by any means necessary. For the 2A community, these increasingly desperate attacks are both a warning and an opportunity. They underscore the importance of supporting voices like Herrera’s who refuse to play defense and instead take the fight directly to the opposition. At the same time, they highlight how critical it is for gun owners to stay engaged, well-informed, and ready to push back against narratives designed to marginalize pro-Second Amendment perspectives. The more the Left overplays its hand with these low-effort smears, the more it risks alienating moderates who might otherwise be receptive to a fact-based discussion about firearms, freedom, and personal responsibility.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

This pattern of attack reveals a deeper insecurity within the gun-control movement. Rather than counter Herrera’s points about the shall-issue nature of constitutional carry or the practical failures of red-flag laws, his detractors are banking on character assassination to do the heavy lifting. It’s a tacit admission that their policy arguments are losing ground, especially as more Americans witness the real-world consequences of restrictive gun laws in cities like Chicago and New York. By focusing on manufactured outrage instead of substantive debate, they’re signaling to their base that the facts aren’t enough—that the cultural shift toward recognizing the Second Amendment as a fundamental right must be stopped by any means necessary.

For the 2A community, these increasingly desperate attacks are both a warning and an opportunity. They underscore the importance of supporting voices like Herrera’s who refuse to play defense and instead take the fight directly to the opposition. At the same time, they highlight how critical it is for gun owners to stay engaged, well-informed, and ready to push back against narratives designed to marginalize pro-Second Amendment perspectives. The more the Left overplays its hand with these low-effort smears, the more it risks alienating moderates who might otherwise be receptive to a fact-based discussion about firearms, freedom, and personal responsibility.

Share this story