A Nigerian website published an opinion column on the United States Supreme Court’s pending AR-15 case. The column stated that a constitutional liberty should not rest on whether officials feel at ease when people use it, and that public safety should not rest on whether firearm supporters dislike a given rule. Its author asked the Court to specify which weapons qualify as protected arms, to treat magazines and similar items apart from the firearms themselves, and to set out the kinds of proof courts must weigh plus which side must produce it. A U.S. writer covering the piece noted that the Court already placed the burden on the government to show a historical tradition of regulation in its Wolford decision this year. The same writer concluded that commentary from other countries on American constitutional questions rarely adds useful insight.