Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging U.S. Supreme Court to Hear the Case of Navy Veteran Patrick “Tate” Adamiak

Listen to Article

The NRA has thrown its weight behind Navy veteran Patrick “Tate” Adamiak, filing a powerful amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to take up his case—a move that could redefine the battle lines in Second Amendment jurisprudence. Adamiak, a decorated vet with service in Iraq and Afghanistan, found himself ensnared by New York’s draconian SAFE Act after loaning a friend a bolt-action rifle for a sanctioned high-power rifle competition. Despite no criminal intent, no use in crime, and the gun’s prompt return, New York charged him with prohibited possession, exploiting the law’s vague loan prohibition that treats temporary firearm sharing like a felony handoff. Joined by heavy hitters like the Second Amendment Foundation, California Rifle & Pistol Association, and Second Amendment Law Center, the NRA’s brief spotlights how this case exposes the SAFE Act’s overreach, punishing law-abiding citizens for everyday acts of sportsmanship in competitive shooting.

This isn’t just about one veteran’s plight; it’s a clarion call for the Supreme Court to dismantle the post-Bruen patchwork of state laws that chip away at Heller’s core promise of an individual right to keep and bear arms. Lower courts have twisted Bruen’s text, history, and tradition test into pretzels, upholding restrictions that would’ve baffled the Founders—imagine James Madison criminalizing a musket loan for a militia drill. Adamiak’s saga underscores a sly regulatory tactic: states reclassifying benign conduct (like loaning a rifle for a match) as transfer crimes, effectively nullifying the right to share firearms for self-defense training or competition without bureaucratic hoops. With the NRA’s brief dissecting historical analogs—where colonial loans for hunting or musters were routine—the stage is set for SCOTUS to affirm that the Second Amendment isn’t a government-issued permission slip.

For the 2A community, the implications are seismic: a win here could torpedo similar schemes in blue states, from California’s loan bans to Illinois’ microstamping mandates, restoring sanity to firearm lending and bolstering veterans’ rights in the process. It’s a reminder that every range day buddy loan or family heirloom pass-down hangs in the balance—Adamiak’s fight is ours. Eyes on the docket; this could be the vehicle to etch Bruen’s victory in stone. Stay vigilant, patriots.

Share this story