Minneapolis to Consider Gun Control Bill Despite State’s Preemption Law

May 6, 2026
6:31 pm

▶

Listen to Article

Minneapolis is once again thumbing its nose at Minnesota's state preemption law, pushing ahead with a local gun control bill that could impose stricter rules on firearm ownership and carry within city limits. This isn't just bureaucratic stubbornness—it's a calculated defiance of the 2023 Minnesota law that explicitly prohibits cities and counties from enacting their own gun regulations, aiming to create a uniform statewide standard. The bill, floated by city council progressives, echoes failed efforts from last year and includes measures like expanded storage requirements and potential limits on public carry, all under the guise of public safety. But let's call it what it is: an end-run around the legislature, betting on activist judges or future DFL majorities to bail them out. The context here is rich with irony. Minnesota's preemption statute was strengthened precisely to stop urban enclaves like Minneapolis from turning into gun-free fiefdoms, post the 2023 legislative session where Democrats held the trifecta but still bowed to broader 2A pressures. This move comes amid rising crime in the city—homicides up 25% in 2023 despite national declines—undermining the safety narrative. For the 2A community, it's a flashing red light: local officials are testing boundaries, potentially setting precedents for lawsuits that drain resources from pro-gun groups like the NRA or MFHA. We've seen this playbook in places like Chicago and San Francisco, where preemption battles escalated to federal courts, ultimately affirming state authority but at great cost. The implications are stark— if Minneapolis succeeds, it greenlights a patchwork of local tyrannies across Minnesota, eroding the right to keep and bear arms for law-abiding citizens traveling or residing in blue strongholds. 2A advocates should mobilize now: flood council meetings, support preemption enforcement bills in the next session, and back allies like Rep. Marion Rarick who’ve vowed to crush these overreaches. This isn't just about one city; it's a microcosm of the national tug-of-war, where urban elites chip away at constitutional carry gains. Stay vigilant, Minnesota—your Second Amendment hangs in the balance.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

Minneapolis is once again thumbing its nose at Minnesota’s state preemption law, pushing ahead with a local gun control bill that could impose stricter rules on firearm ownership and carry within city limits. This isn’t just bureaucratic stubbornness—it’s a calculated defiance of the 2023 Minnesota law that explicitly prohibits cities and counties from enacting their own gun regulations, aiming to create a uniform statewide standard. The bill, floated by city council progressives, echoes failed efforts from last year and includes measures like expanded storage requirements and potential limits on public carry, all under the guise of public safety. But let’s call it what it is: an end-run around the legislature, betting on activist judges or future DFL majorities to bail them out.

The context here is rich with irony. Minnesota’s preemption statute was strengthened precisely to stop urban enclaves like Minneapolis from turning into gun-free fiefdoms, post the 2023 legislative session where Democrats held the trifecta but still bowed to broader 2A pressures. This move comes amid rising crime in the city—homicides up 25% in 2023 despite national declines—undermining the safety narrative. For the 2A community, it’s a flashing red light: local officials are testing boundaries, potentially setting precedents for lawsuits that drain resources from pro-gun groups like the NRA or MFHA. We’ve seen this playbook in places like Chicago and San Francisco, where preemption battles escalated to federal courts, ultimately affirming state authority but at great cost.

The implications are stark— if Minneapolis succeeds, it greenlights a patchwork of local tyrannies across Minnesota, eroding the right to keep and bear arms for law-abiding citizens traveling or residing in blue strongholds. 2A advocates should mobilize now: flood council meetings, support preemption enforcement bills in the next session, and back allies like Rep. Marion Rarick who’ve vowed to crush these overreaches. This isn’t just about one city; it’s a microcosm of the national tug-of-war, where urban elites chip away at constitutional carry gains. Stay vigilant, Minnesota—your Second Amendment hangs in the balance.

Share this story