Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

pew report black

Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Enes Kanter Told Angel Reese He Will Humble Her This Way Once He Enters the WNBA

Listen to Article

Enes Kanter’s latest jab at Angel Reese isn’t just another social-media sideswipe—it’s a reminder that the same cultural forces trying to erase biological reality in sports are also the ones that want to erase the Second Amendment. When the former NBA center, now a proud American citizen and outspoken critic of authoritarian regimes, promises to “humble” the LSU star “once he enters the WNBA,” the line is obviously tongue-in-cheek; what isn’t funny is how quickly the same activists who cheer biological males in women’s categories also cheer for disarming the very women they claim to protect. Kanter’s willingness to lampoon the absurdity highlights a broader truth: if we allow ideology to rewrite the rules of fair play on the court, it’s only a matter of time before the same reasoning disarms lawful citizens on the street.

For the 2A community, the parallel is clear. Just as female athletes lose scholarships, podiums, and safety when rules ignore immutable biology, law-abiding gun owners lose rights when “public safety” is redefined by emotion rather than data. Studies from the CDC’s own injury reports and the National Academy of Sciences consistently show that defensive gun uses outnumber criminal ones; yet the same voices demanding testosterone thresholds be ignored in sports insist that magazine limits and “red flag” laws be imposed without due process. Kanter, who fled Turkish authoritarianism and now embraces American liberty, embodies the immigrant success story that gun-control advocates conveniently ignore—millions of newcomers arrive here precisely because the Constitution still protects the individual against the collective.

Ultimately, the dust-up between a retired center and a college phenom is a sideshow, but the principle at stake is not. Whether the arena is a basketball court or a voting booth, the pattern is identical: redefine fairness until fairness itself disappears, then demand that dissenters surrender their ability to resist. The 2A community’s answer remains unchanged—preserve the plain text, reject the euphemisms, and keep the same vigilance on the range that athletes demand on the hardwood.

Share this story