Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Defense Attorney Attempts to Blame Client’s Mass Shooting on Lack of Gun Control

Listen to Article

In a courtroom twist that reeks of desperation, a defense attorney for mass shooter Billy Ray Jones tried to pin the blame for his client’s 2021 Indiana mall rampage—not on the perpetrator’s twisted psyche or deliberate choices—but on the state’s lax gun laws. According to reports from the Indianapolis Star and Fox News, attorney Mark Small argued that Indiana’s permissive concealed carry policies and lack of universal background checks enabled Jones to legally purchase the handgun used in the attack, which left one dead and several wounded. Judge Mark Stoner wasn’t buying it, slamming Jones with an 88-year sentence for murder and attempted murders, effectively calling the defense’s gun control sob story what it was: a pathetic Hail Mary to dodge accountability.

This isn’t just another failed legal gambit; it’s a textbook example of the anti-2A playbook in action, where gun-grabbers infiltrate even criminal defenses to push their narrative that more laws = fewer crimes. Never mind that Jones passed all federal background checks, had no prior disqualifying convictions, and chose to ignore every gun-free zone sign at the Greenwood Park Mall—where, ironically, an armed civilian hero ended the threat in under a minute. Indiana’s robust shall-issue permitting and constitutional carry (adopted in 2022) didn’t cause this shooting; they empowered that good Samaritan to stop it cold. The defense’s argument crumbles under scrutiny: if stricter laws worked, criminals like Jones—who often skirt them anyway—would magically obey. FBI data backs this up, showing permit holders commit violent crimes at rates far below the general population, while assault weapon bans and red flag laws in places like California haven’t curbed rising mass shootings.

For the 2A community, this case is a rallying cry and a warning. It exposes how gun control myths get laundered through courtrooms to sway public opinion, even as judges like Stoner rightly reject them. Celebrate the win—88 years means one less threat on the streets—but stay vigilant: expect more attorneys, activists, and media outlets to recycle this blame-shifting tactic. Arm yourself with facts, support pro-2A legislators fortifying Indiana-style reforms nationwide, and remember: the real gun show loophole is the one criminals exploit when law-abiding citizens are disarmed. This story reinforces why the Second Amendment isn’t negotiable—it’s our bulwark against both monsters and the opportunists who defend them.

Share this story