Citizens’s Committee Highlights Issue With Another of Spanberger’s Gun Control Amendments

April 16, 2026
11:45 am

▶

Listen to Article

The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) is sounding the alarm on yet another overreaching gun control amendment pushed by Virginia Congresswoman Abigail Spanberger, this time tying it directly to the state's controversial HB 1525. For those unfamiliar, HB 1525 is Virginia's latest assault on the Second Amendment, mandating warning labels on firearms sold in the commonwealth—think government-mandated scarlet letters screaming about supposed risks, all while ignoring the proven life-saving reality of armed self-defense. Spanberger's amendment, slipped into federal legislation, amplifies this nonsense by potentially federalizing similar restrictions, turning a state-level folly into a national blueprint for bureaucratic busywork that does nothing to stop criminals who, by definition, ignore laws. What's clever—and insidious—about Spanberger's move is how it masquerades as common-sense safety while eroding the core of 2A protections. These labels aren't neutral; they're propaganda tools designed to stigmatize lawful gun ownership, much like California's microstamping mandates or New York's excise taxes on firearms, which courts have repeatedly slapped down as unconstitutional burdens. The CCRKBA's spotlight here is spot-on: by linking her amendment to HB 1525, Spanberger exposes her true aim—chipping away at the Heller decision's affirmation that the right to bear arms isn't contingent on Big Brother's permission slips. Data from the CDC and FBI backs this up: defensive gun uses outnumber criminal ones by orders of magnitude (up to 2.5 million annually per Kleck's research), yet politicians like her prioritize feelings over facts. For the 2A community, the implications are crystal clear: this is attrition warfare, where incremental amendments like Spanberger's accumulate into outright bans. Virginia gun owners, already battling a post-2020 Democrat supermajority's red-flag expansions and one-handgun-a-month limits, now face federal echoes that could spread nationwide. It's a call to action—rally behind CCRKBA's pushback, flood your reps with calls, and support recalls or primaries for anti-2A incumbents. If we let these harmless labels stand, the slippery slope ends at registration, confiscation, and compliance. Stay vigilant; our rights depend on it.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

What’s clever—and insidious—about Spanberger’s move is how it masquerades as common-sense safety while eroding the core of 2A protections. These labels aren’t neutral; they’re propaganda tools designed to stigmatize lawful gun ownership, much like California’s microstamping mandates or New York’s excise taxes on firearms, which courts have repeatedly slapped down as unconstitutional burdens. The CCRKBA’s spotlight here is spot-on: by linking her amendment to HB 1525, Spanberger exposes her true aim—chipping away at the Heller decision’s affirmation that the right to bear arms isn’t contingent on Big Brother’s permission slips. Data from the CDC and FBI backs this up: defensive gun uses outnumber criminal ones by orders of magnitude (up to 2.5 million annually per Kleck’s research), yet politicians like her prioritize feelings over facts.

For the 2A community, the implications are crystal clear: this is attrition warfare, where incremental amendments like Spanberger’s accumulate into outright bans. Virginia gun owners, already battling a post-2020 Democrat supermajority’s red-flag expansions and one-handgun-a-month limits, now face federal echoes that could spread nationwide. It’s a call to action—rally behind CCRKBA’s pushback, flood your reps with calls, and support recalls or primaries for anti-2A incumbents. If we let these harmless labels stand, the slippery slope ends at registration, confiscation, and compliance. Stay vigilant; our rights depend on it.

Share this story