Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

pew report black

Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

All Hell Broke Loose When Jamie Raskin Got Himself Caught

Listen to Article

Jamie Raskin’s meltdown during the sanctuary-cities hearing wasn’t just another D.C. sideshow; it was a textbook example of how the same politicians who want to strip citizens of their right to keep and bear arms also want to strip cities of their duty to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. When Raskin tried to lecture witnesses about “compassion,” Republicans countered with hard numbers showing that sanctuary policies create safe havens for repeat offenders—many of them illegal aliens already barred from possessing firearms under federal law. The 2A community should take note: every time a sanctuary jurisdiction releases a prohibited person back into the streets, it increases the likelihood that a lawfully armed citizen will have to finish the job law enforcement was prevented from completing.

The Supreme Court’s recent signals on birthright citizenship and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s rambling dissent only sharpen the stakes. If citizenship itself becomes a political football rather than a clearly defined constitutional status, the door opens for future administrations to redefine who counts as part of “the people” protected by the Second Amendment. JD Vance’s blunt reminder that Republicans must actually use power when they hold it—rather than merely denounce its misuse—applies directly to gun owners: without aggressive enforcement of existing prohibitions on criminal aliens and without rolling back the ATF’s pistol-brace and frame-receiver rules, the right to arms remains one executive order away from being hollowed out.

For the 2A community, the takeaway is straightforward. Sanctuary cities, birthright-citizenship games, and activist judges are not separate issues; they are connected fronts in the same battle over who gets to decide the scope of constitutional rights. When politicians like Raskin treat federal immigration law as optional, they also treat the Second Amendment as optional. The only durable defense is a Congress and an executive branch willing to treat both the border and the Bill of Rights as non-negotiable.

Share this story