DNR Seeks Public Input on Lifting Bear Hunting Prohibition on Bois Blanc Island

August 5, 2026
4:32 am

▶

Listen to Article

Michigan’s Department of Natural Resources is quietly testing whether a 38-year-old bear-hunting ban on Bois Blanc Island still makes sense, and the answer could ripple far beyond Mackinac County. The island’s prohibition was slapped on in 1985 when the bear population was tiny and the human footprint even smaller; today the DNR’s own surveys show a healthy, self-sustaining bruin population that occasionally collides with island residents and their livestock. By opening state land to hunters—while still requiring landowner permission on private parcels—the agency is acknowledging that regulated harvest, not blanket prohibition, is the modern tool for balancing wildlife and people. For Second Amendment advocates, the move is a textbook example of how sound wildlife management and the right to keep and bear arms reinforce each other: hunters become the boots-on-the-ground data collectors and population stewards that anti-hunting activists claim to champion. The optics matter, too. Michigan already boasts some of the nation’s most sportsman-friendly bear regulations, yet one tiny island has remained an ideological “no-go zone.” Lifting that restriction signals that even legacy restrictions are subject to fresh biological scrutiny rather than permanent political inertia. If the public-comment period produces broad support, the precedent could embolden other states to revisit similarly dated, non-scientific closures. Conversely, if vocal preservationist groups flood the inbox of Cody Norton at the DNR, the episode will illustrate how easily a single motivated faction can override both data and local sentiment. Either outcome will be watched closely by the broader firearms community, because every precedent set in wildlife policy eventually migrates to the regulatory treatment of the tools used to implement that policy. At its core, the Bois Blanc proposal is a reminder that the Second Amendment is most secure when it is exercised. A hunter on Bois Blanc Island isn’t merely filling a tag; they’re participating in an open, transparent process that keeps wildlife decisions tethered to reality instead of remote ideology. That participation—submitting comments, attending meetings, and, yes, responsibly harvesting when the science says it’s sustainable—is the daily work of preserving the right to bear arms long after the courtroom victories are won.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

The optics matter, too. Michigan already boasts some of the nation’s most sportsman-friendly bear regulations, yet one tiny island has remained an ideological “no-go zone.” Lifting that restriction signals that even legacy restrictions are subject to fresh biological scrutiny rather than permanent political inertia. If the public-comment period produces broad support, the precedent could embolden other states to revisit similarly dated, non-scientific closures. Conversely, if vocal preservationist groups flood the inbox of Cody Norton at the DNR, the episode will illustrate how easily a single motivated faction can override both data and local sentiment. Either outcome will be watched closely by the broader firearms community, because every precedent set in wildlife policy eventually migrates to the regulatory treatment of the tools used to implement that policy.

At its core, the Bois Blanc proposal is a reminder that the Second Amendment is most secure when it is exercised. A hunter on Bois Blanc Island isn’t merely filling a tag; they’re participating in an open, transparent process that keeps wildlife decisions tethered to reality instead of remote ideology. That participation—submitting comments, attending meetings, and, yes, responsibly harvesting when the science says it’s sustainable—is the daily work of preserving the right to bear arms long after the courtroom victories are won.

Share this story