Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Illinois Lawmakers Moves to Ban Glocks, Clones

Listen to Article

Illinois lawmakers are once again proving that facts and the Constitution are mere suggestions when it comes to their crusade against lawfully owned firearms. The latest target is a sweeping ban on Glocks and any pistol that shares its operating system or even looks similar, all under the absurd pretext that these pistols are somehow “convertible” into machine guns. This isn’t about public safety or closing loopholes; it’s another transparent attempt to incrementally disarm law-abiding citizens by criminalizing the most popular, reliable, and widely owned handgun platform in America.

What makes this move particularly insulting is the complete lack of intellectual honesty. Glock pistols have been in civilian hands for decades, used by millions of Americans for self-defense, competition, and training without turning into illicit auto-sears. The “convertible” language is the same rhetorical sleight-of-hand we’ve seen with so-called assault weapon bans and pistol brace rules: redefine common firearm features as inherently dangerous, then punish ownership. Illinois, already burdened with some of the strictest gun laws in the nation and correspondingly dismal violent crime rates in Chicago, has decided the solution is to attack responsible gun owners in Peoria and Springfield instead of addressing the actual criminals who ignore every law on the books.

For the 2A community this serves as yet another reminder that rights are never permanently secured, only continuously defended. Every state-level ban on popular handguns is a deliberate erosion of the Supreme Court’s Bruen standard, which demands historical analogues for modern restrictions. There is no historical tradition of banning entire classes of semiautomatic handguns because a tiny fraction of them might be illegally modified. The real conversion happening here is the steady transformation of constitutional carry into constitutional begging. Expect legal challenges to move swiftly, but the deeper implication is clear: blue states are racing to pass the most extreme measures possible before courts force them to respect shall not be infringed. The 2A community must continue to expose this bad faith legislating while supporting organizations and lawmakers who treat the right to keep and bear arms as a non-negotiable line in the sand.

Share this story