Video: ‘The View’s Whoopi Goldberg Claims ‘No One Wants Voter ID Laws’ While 80 Percent of America Supports ID to Vote

June 25, 2026
7:11 pm

▶

Listen to Article

Whoopi Goldberg’s claim on “The View” that “no one wants voter ID laws” lands with the same credibility as a gun-grabber insisting that “nobody wants an AR-15”—it’s a talking point that collapses the moment you check the data. Recent polling shows roughly 80 percent of Americans, including majorities of Black and Hispanic voters, support requiring photo ID at the polls, yet the show’s panel treated the idea as some fringe plot to suppress turnout. The disconnect isn’t accidental; it’s the same rhetorical sleight-of-hand used to paint law-abiding gun owners as extremists while ignoring that the overwhelming majority simply want secure, verifiable elections the same way they want secure, verifiable background checks. For the 2A community the lesson is straightforward: when elites dismiss basic identification requirements as racist or burdensome, they reveal a deeper contempt for individual responsibility and constitutional accountability. Voter ID mirrors the shall-issue carry standards and enhanced background checks that responsible gun owners already navigate without issue; both systems rest on the premise that citizens can prove who they are and that government exists to protect rights, not presume guilt. When one side pretends these commonsense safeguards are attacks on democracy, it signals they may soon apply the same logic to magazine limits, permitless carry, or even the Second Amendment itself. The broader implication is that culture-war fights over election integrity and gun rights are two fronts of the same battle over whether the Constitution still means what it says. If 80 percent of the country can be caricatured as bigots for wanting to confirm a voter’s identity, then the 70-plus percent who support the right to keep and bear arms can just as easily be labeled “threats to democracy.” The 2A community should treat every attempt to normalize this gaslighting as a warning shot: the same institutions eager to strip away election safeguards are the ones already pushing red-flag laws, assault-weapon bans, and registration schemes. Staying alert to the pattern is how we keep both the ballot box and the gun safe.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

For the 2A community the lesson is straightforward: when elites dismiss basic identification requirements as racist or burdensome, they reveal a deeper contempt for individual responsibility and constitutional accountability. Voter ID mirrors the shall-issue carry standards and enhanced background checks that responsible gun owners already navigate without issue; both systems rest on the premise that citizens can prove who they are and that government exists to protect rights, not presume guilt. When one side pretends these commonsense safeguards are attacks on democracy, it signals they may soon apply the same logic to magazine limits, permitless carry, or even the Second Amendment itself.

The broader implication is that culture-war fights over election integrity and gun rights are two fronts of the same battle over whether the Constitution still means what it says. If 80 percent of the country can be caricatured as bigots for wanting to confirm a voter’s identity, then the 70-plus percent who support the right to keep and bear arms can just as easily be labeled “threats to democracy.” The 2A community should treat every attempt to normalize this gaslighting as a warning shot: the same institutions eager to strip away election safeguards are the ones already pushing red-flag laws, assault-weapon bans, and registration schemes. Staying alert to the pattern is how we keep both the ballot box and the gun safe.

Share this story