Van Hollen: Trump ‘Has Lost It and the World Knows It’

June 12, 2026
3:32 am

▶

Listen to Article

Sen. Chris Van Hollen’s latest meltdown on MSNBC isn’t just another partisan jab—it’s a window into how the anti-gun crowd is scrambling now that the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision has yanked the rug out from under decades of “may-issue” gun-control schemes. When Van Hollen claims Trump has “lost it,” what he’s really signaling is panic that a second Trump term could finish the job Bruen started: forcing states like Maryland, New York, and California to treat the right to bear arms as the constitutional default rather than a privilege dispensed by bureaucrats. The senator’s rhetoric is calibrated for a donor base that still believes the 2020-era narrative of Trump as uniquely dangerous, yet the same voters who delivered record gun sales and concealed-carry permit surges during his first term are unlikely to be swayed by cable-news hyperbole. For the 2A community the stakes are concrete. Trump’s first term produced three originalist justices who delivered Bruen; a second term would likely mean a Justice Department willing to challenge “sensitive places” restrictions, red-flag laws, and pistol-brace rules that the ATF tried to ram through under Biden. Van Hollen’s outburst also telegraphs the left’s fallback strategy: if they can’t win legislatively, they’ll try to delegitimize any future pro-Second-Amendment executive actions as the product of presidential instability. That framing collapses the moment you look at the data—violent crime rates in shall-issue states have not exploded, and the predicted wave of “blood in the streets” never materialized after constitutional carry expansions. The larger implication is that the gun-control movement is running out of both legal and political oxygen. Every time a Democratic senator reaches for the “Trump is unhinged” talking point, it underscores how little substantive argument remains once the courts have affirmed that the right to keep and bear arms is not subject to a state official’s feelings. For law-abiding gun owners, the message is clear: the 2024 election isn’t just about personalities; it’s about whether the Bruen revolution gets an executive branch willing to enforce it nationwide or another four years of regulatory trench warfare from agencies that still view the Second Amendment as an obstacle rather than a command.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

For the 2A community the stakes are concrete. Trump’s first term produced three originalist justices who delivered Bruen; a second term would likely mean a Justice Department willing to challenge “sensitive places” restrictions, red-flag laws, and pistol-brace rules that the ATF tried to ram through under Biden. Van Hollen’s outburst also telegraphs the left’s fallback strategy: if they can’t win legislatively, they’ll try to delegitimize any future pro-Second-Amendment executive actions as the product of presidential instability. That framing collapses the moment you look at the data—violent crime rates in shall-issue states have not exploded, and the predicted wave of “blood in the streets” never materialized after constitutional carry expansions.

The larger implication is that the gun-control movement is running out of both legal and political oxygen. Every time a Democratic senator reaches for the “Trump is unhinged” talking point, it underscores how little substantive argument remains once the courts have affirmed that the right to keep and bear arms is not subject to a state official’s feelings. For law-abiding gun owners, the message is clear: the 2024 election isn’t just about personalities; it’s about whether the Bruen revolution gets an executive branch willing to enforce it nationwide or another four years of regulatory trench warfare from agencies that still view the Second Amendment as an obstacle rather than a command.

Share this story