Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Top House Armed Services Dem: Won’t Back Iran Supplemental, It Gives Trump, Who Has ‘Record of Abusing’ Power, More Money

Listen to Article

Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA), the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, just dropped a bombshell on MSNBC’s All In, declaring he won’t back an Iran supplemental funding bill. Why? Because it would hand more money to President Trump, whom he accuses of having a record of abusing power. Smith’s logic: pump the brakes on escalating the conflict, get that under control, stop the bleeding—his words cut off mid-sentence, but the message is clear. This isn’t just partisan sniping; it’s a Democrat openly prioritizing domestic political gamesmanship over bolstering U.S. military readiness against a regime that’s been chanting Death to America while arming proxies from Yemen to Lebanon.

Dig deeper, and Smith’s stance reeks of hypocrisy that should have every 2A advocate’s radar pinging. This is the same Adam Smith who’s spent years pushing to defund police, hamstring the military with woke DEI mandates, and erode Second Amendment protections under the guise of common-sense reforms. Remember his votes for bloated infrastructure bills that funneled billions into green energy boondoggles while shortchanging actual defense? Now, facing a real threat like Iran’s nuclear ambitions and ballistic missile barrages, he balks at supplemental funding—not because it’s unnecessary (DOD has been crystal clear on the gaps), but because it might empower a Trump administration to project strength. For the 2A community, this is a masterclass in selective pacifism: Democrats cheer endless Ukraine aid (over $175 billion and counting) that arms foreign fighters with U.S. weapons, yet clutch pearls at the thought of resourcing our own forces against Iran. It’s the same playbook that leaves our borders porous and our troops under-equipped, all while they lecture gun owners about responsible stewardship.

The implications for Second Amendment supporters are stark: if Smith’s crew won’t fund the warfighter abroad, don’t expect them to defend the armed citizen at home. This resistance signals a broader anti-strength agenda—starve the military, demonize Trump, and chip away at the very deterrence that keeps tyrants like the Ayatollahs in check. 2A patriots know the score: a weak America invites aggression everywhere, from Tehran to our streets. Trump’s abuse of power? Try building the world’s strongest military without apology. Smith’s no-vote is a gift to our enemies and a reminder why we fight for the right to keep and bear arms—to fill the voids left by spineless politicians. Stay vigilant, stock up, and vote accordingly.

Share this story