Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

pew report black

Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

The Atlantic’s Brooks: SCOTUS Defers Too Much to POTUS, Like on Obamacare

Listen to Article

David Brooks’ observation that the Supreme Court “hates to take on a sitting president” lands like a warning shot for anyone who still believes the judiciary will reliably police executive overreach. When the Court ducked a full reckoning with Obamacare’s sprawling mandates, it signaled that institutional caution often trumps constitutional clarity—especially when the political stakes are high. For the 2A community, that pattern is familiar: agencies from the ATF to the DOJ have spent years stretching statutes and issuing “guidance” that functions like law, betting the justices will blink rather than confront a president mid-term. The result is a slow-motion expansion of administrative power that treats the right to keep and bear arms as just another regulatory checkbox rather than a pre-existing liberty.

What Brooks frames as judicial deference looks, from the gun-owner’s vantage, like a structural disadvantage. Every time the Court waits for a new administration or a friendlier Congress before engaging, the regulatory state keeps printing rules—bump-stock bans, pistol-brace reclassifications, “zero tolerance” policies aimed at FFLs—that shift the practical baseline before any lawsuit can catch up. The 2A community has learned to treat each election cycle as a potential reset button, stockpiling litigation resources and state-level protections because federal courts may again choose institutional peace over textual confrontation. That dynamic rewards presidents who move first and fastest, not those who stay within enumerated lanes.

The deeper implication is that Second Amendment advocates cannot outsource their security to nine justices who prize comity with the executive branch. Real resilience comes from hardening state constitutions, building parallel legal infrastructures, and keeping political pressure high enough that even a cautious Court eventually has to notice. Brooks may be describing a feature of the modern judiciary; for gun owners it functions as a recurring bug that only relentless, multi-front engagement can patch.

Share this story