Hate ads?! Want to be able to search and filter? Day and Night mode? Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Stacey Abrams: SCOTUS Trying to Create ‘Democracy-Proof Duma’

Listen to Article

Stacey Abrams just dropped a bombshell on MSNBC’s All In, claiming the Supreme Court’s recent smackdown of Louisiana’s voting map is nothing less than an attempt to forge a democracy-proof Duma—evoking the rubber-stamp Russian parliament that nods along to Putin’s whims. For those scoring at home, this stems from the Court’s 6-3 ruling in *Robinson v. Ardoin*, where they tossed out a lower court’s redraw of Louisiana’s congressional districts, upholding the state’s original map that dodged aggressive gerrymandering for a second majority-Black district. Abrams, ever the election-year firebrand, paints this as judicial overreach shielding democracy from the masses, but let’s peel back the layers: it’s classic progressive sleight-of-hand, repackaging a loss on racial gerrymandering as an assault on democracy itself.

Dig deeper, and Abrams’ rhetoric isn’t just hyperbolic—it’s a trial balloon for the left’s escalating war on institutional checks. The Duma analogy? Cleverly sinister, implying SCOTUS justices are authoritarian puppeteers, much like how critics once branded the Electoral College a democracy-proof relic. Yet this Louisiana map was drawn to comply with the Voting Rights Act without the racial quotas progressives crave, preserving competitive districts over engineered outcomes. The real irony? The same Court that greenlit this also just expanded gun rights in *Bruen* (2022), striking down may-issue schemes that let bureaucrats play God with your 2A protections. Abrams’ outrage underscores a pattern: when unelected judges or state legislatures block one-party dominance—be it in voting blocs or concealed carry permits—suddenly they’re anti-democratic.

For the 2A community, this is a flashing red light. If SCOTUS buckles under democracy-proof smears for maps, expect amplified assaults on *Heller*, *McDonald*, and *Bruen*—framing self-defense rights as threats to democracy in blue strongholds. Louisiana’s map fight proves the Court’s textualist spine holds (for now), a bulwark against the very Duma-style consolidation Abrams fears but from the other side. Gun owners, take note: rally behind originalism, because the alternative is a system where your rights get redistricted into oblivion, one hysterical MSNBC rant at a time.

Share this story